首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Percutaneous thoracic drainage in neonates: catheter drainage versus treatment with aspiration alone.
【24h】

Percutaneous thoracic drainage in neonates: catheter drainage versus treatment with aspiration alone.

机译:新生儿经皮胸腔引流:导管引流与单纯抽吸治疗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare thoracic drainage in neonates by using catheter and aspiration techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Approval was obtained from the institutional research ethics board; informed consent from parents was waived. Retrospective review of 21 neonates (19 boys, two girls; mean gestational age, 39.3 weeks) who underwent percutaneous thoracic drainage during a 9-year period was performed. Data such as indication for drainage, type of drainage, age and weight at birth, corrected age and weight at the time of drainage, use of mechanical ventilation at the time of drainage, and outcomes were collected. Drainage was considered successful if the collection was treated without additional surgical or radiologic intervention. Fisher exact test and two-tailed unpaired student t test with a confidence level of 95% (unequal variances assumed) were used to compare neonates treated with a catheter and those treated with aspiration. RESULTS: Image-guided therapy was used to treat pleural effusion (29%, n = 6), chylothorax (24%, n = 5), empyema (19%, n = 4), pneumothorax (14%, n = 3), mediastinal seroma (10%, n = 3), and congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation (5%, n = 1). Sixteen (76%) infants were treated with catheter placement, with a success rate of 81% (13 of 16). Five (24%) infants were treated with simple aspiration with no success. The difference in success rates was significant (P = .003). There was no significant difference between the catheter placement and aspiration groups in terms of average age, average weight, and percentage dependent on mechanical ventilation. One complication (cellulitis) was directly related to catheter drainage. In cases where treatment was successful, the mean length of the chest tube placement was 13.5 days, and there were no deaths at follow-up. In cases where treatment failed, the long-term mortality rate was 50% (four of eight). CONCLUSION: Image-guided percutaneous thoracic drainage success rates are improved if drainage catheters are placed rather than if aspiration alone is performed.
机译:目的:通过导管和抽吸技术回顾性比较新生儿的胸腔引流。材料与方法:从机构研究伦理委员会获得批准;放弃了父母的知情同意。回顾性分析了21例在9年内行经胸腔引流的新生儿(男19例,女2例;平均胎龄39.3周)。收集诸如引流的指示,引流的类型,出生时的年龄和体重,引流时的校正年龄和体重,引流时使用机械通气以及结局等数据。如果对收集物进行了额外的外科手术或放射学干预,则认为引流成功。使用Fisher精确检验和置信度为95%(假设不等方差)的两尾不配对学生t检验来比较经导管治疗的婴儿和经抽吸治疗的婴儿。结果:采用影像引导疗法治疗胸腔积液(29%,n = 6),乳糜胸(24%,n = 5),脓胸(19%,n = 4),气胸(14%,n = 3)。 ,纵隔血清肿(10%,n = 3)和先天性囊性腺瘤样畸形(5%,n = 1)。 16例(76%)婴儿接受了导管置入术治疗,成功率为81%(16例中的13例)。五名(24%)婴儿接受单纯抽吸治疗未成功。成功率差异显着(P = .003)。就平均年龄,平均体重和取决于机械通气的百分比而言,导管放置和抽吸组之间没有显着差异。一种并发症(蜂窝织炎)与导管引流直接相关。在治疗成功的情况下,平均放置胸管的时间为13.5天,随访时无死亡。如果治疗失败,则长期死亡率为50%(八分之四)。结论:如果放置引流导管,而不是单独进行抽吸,则图像引导的经皮胸腔引流成功率会提高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号