...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Differentiation of benign from malignant solid breast masses: conventional US versus spatial compound imaging.
【24h】

Differentiation of benign from malignant solid breast masses: conventional US versus spatial compound imaging.

机译:良性和恶性乳腺肿块的区分:常规US成像与空间复合成像。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare prospectively the diagnostic performance of radiologists who used conventional ultrasonography (US) with that of radiologists who used spatial compound imaging for the differentiation of benign from malignant solid breast masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was obtained. Before excisional or needle biopsy was performed, conventional US and spatial compound images were obtained in 67 patients (age range, 25-67 years; mean age, 45 years) with 75 solid breast masses (21 cancers and 54 benign lesions). Three experienced radiologists who did not perform the examinations independently analyzed US findings and indicated the probability of malignancy. Results were evaluated with kappa statistics and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: For US findings, the presence of calcifications was the most discordant feature (kappa = 0.372) between conventional US and spatial compound imaging, followed by echotexture (kappa = 0.439), boundary echo (kappa = 0.496), orientation (kappa = 0.518), echogenicity (kappa = 0.523), shape (kappa = 0.526), margin (kappa = 0.569), and posterior acoustic transmission (kappa = 0.669). The area under the ROC curve for conventional US was 0.79 for reader 1, 0.88 for reader 2, and 0.82 for reader 3, and the area under the ROC curve for spatial compound imaging was 0.85 for reader 1, 0.88 for reader 2, and 0.89 for reader 3. The partial area index for conventional US was 0.29 for reader 1, 0.69 for reader 2, and 0.39 for reader 3, and the partial area index for spatial compound imaging was 0.29 for reader 1, 0.65 for reader 2, and 0.39 for reader 3. The difference between the diagnostic performances of the two techniques was not significant (P > .05). CONCLUSION: The performance of the radiologists with respect to the characterization of solid breast masses was not significantly improved with spatial compound imaging.
机译:目的:前瞻性比较使用常规超声检查(US)的放射科医生与使用空间复合成像鉴别良性和恶性乳腺肿块的放射科医生的诊断性能。材料与方法:该研究得到机构审查委员会的批准,并获得知情同意。在进行切除活检或穿刺活检之前,对67例乳腺肿块(21例癌症和54例良性病变)的67例患者(年龄范围为25-67岁;平均年龄为45岁)进行了常规的US和空间复合图像检查。三名没有进行检查的经验丰富的放射科医生独立分析了美国的发现,并指出了发生恶性肿瘤的可能性。结果通过κ统计和接收器工作特性(ROC)分析进行评估。结果:对于美国的发现,钙化的存在是常规美国和空间复合成像之间最不一致的特征(kappa = 0.372),其次是回声纹理(kappa = 0.439),边界回波(kappa = 0.496),方向(kappa = 0.518) ),回声(kappa = 0.523),形状(kappa = 0.526),边缘(kappa = 0.569)和后部声波传播(kappa = 0.669)。常规US的ROC曲线下的面积对于阅读器1为0.79,对于阅读器2为0.88,对于阅读器3为0.82,对于空间复合成像,ROC曲线下的面积对于阅读器1为0.85,对于阅读器2为0.88,对于0.89对于阅读器3,常规US的部分面积指数对于阅读器1为0.29,对于阅读器2为0.69,对于阅读器3为0.39,对于空间复合成像,对于阅读器1为0.29,对于阅读器2为0.65,对于0.39对于阅读器3.两种技术的诊断性能之间的差异不明显(P> .05)。结论:放射线医师对固体乳腺肿块的表征在空间复合成像方面并未得到明显改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号