...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Acute Appendicitis in Young Adults: Low- versus Standard-Radiation-Dose Contrast-enhanced Abdominal CT for Diagnosis.
【24h】

Acute Appendicitis in Young Adults: Low- versus Standard-Radiation-Dose Contrast-enhanced Abdominal CT for Diagnosis.

机译:青年人急性阑尾炎:低剂量与标准剂量对比增强腹部CT诊断。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare low and standard radiation doses in intravenous contrast material-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in young adults. Materials and Methods: The institutional review board approved this retrospective study and waived informed consent. The study included 257 patients (age range, 15-40 years) who underwent CT for suspected appendicitis performed by using a low radiation dose (n = 125) or a standard radiation dose (n = 132). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, Fisher exact tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare the diagnosis of appendicitis and diagnostic confidence as recorded in prospective CT reports between the two groups. Results: For 55 low-radiation-dose (median dose-length product, 122 mGy . cm) and 44 standard-dose (median dose-length product, 544 mGy . cm) examinations, one of two abdominal radiologists made primary reports that served as final reports. For the remaining examinations, on-call radiologists with differing levels of experience issued preliminary reports and the two abdominal radiologists then provided final reports. In the primary reports, the low- and standard-dose CT groups did not significantly differ in area under the ROC curve (0.96 vs 0.97, P = .76), sensitivity (90% [38 of 42] vs 89% [47 of 53], P > .99), or specificity (92% [76 of 83] vs 94% [74 of 79], P = .74) in the diagnosis of appendicitis. There was also no significant difference between the two groups in the confidence level when diagnosing (P = .71) or excluding (P = .20) appendicitis in the primary reports. Similar results were observed for the final reports. The two dose groups also did not significantly differ in terms of appendiceal visualization, diagnosis of appendiceal perforation, or sensitivity for alternative diagnoses. Conclusion: Low-dose CT may have comparable diagnostic performance to standard-dose CT for the diagnosis of appendicitis in young adults. (c) RSNA, 2011.
机译:目的:比较静脉造影剂增强腹部计算机断层扫描(CT)中的低辐射剂量和标准辐射剂量,以诊断年轻人的急性阑尾炎。资料和方法:机构审查委员会批准了这项回顾性研究,并放弃了知情同意。该研究包括257例(年龄范围为15-40岁)因低剂量(n = 125)或标准剂量(n = 132)进行的可疑阑尾炎CT检查的患者。接受者操作特征(ROC)分析,Fisher精确检验和Mann-Whitney U检验用于比较两组间前瞻性CT报告中记录的阑尾炎的诊断和置信度。结果:对于55次低辐射剂量(中等剂量长度乘积,122 mGy。cm)和44次标准剂量(中等剂量长度乘积,544 mGy。cm)检查,两名腹部放射科医生中的一名做了主要报告,作为最终报告。对于其余的检查,经验不同的待命放射线医生会发布初步报告,然后两名腹部放射线医生会提供最终报告。在主要报告中,低剂量和标准剂量CT组在ROC曲线下的面积无明显差异(0.96 vs 0.97,P = 0.76),敏感性(90%[42的38] vs 89%[47的47])。 53],P> .99)或特异性(92%[83 of 76] vs 94%[74 of 79],P = .74),以诊断阑尾炎。初次报告中诊断(P = .71)或排除(P = .20)阑尾炎时,两组的置信度水平也无显着差异。对于最终报告,观察到了相似的结果。这两个剂量组在阑尾可视化,阑尾穿孔的诊断或其他诊断的敏感性方面也没有显着差异。结论:低剂量CT在诊断青年人阑尾炎方面可能具有与标准剂量CT相当的诊断性能。 (c)RSNA,2011年。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号