...
首页> 外文期刊>Livestock Science >Ecological and economic evaluation of Dutch egg production systems
【24h】

Ecological and economic evaluation of Dutch egg production systems

机译:荷兰鸡蛋生产系统的生态和经济评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The upcoming ban on battery cages in the European Union is expected to cause a shift in husbandry systems from predominantly battery cages to enriched cages and loose housing systems, such as barn, free range and organic systems. To gain insight into ecological and economic consequences of such a ban, we quantified the ecological and economic performance of the most commonly used egg production systems in the Netherlands, and identified which parameters explain differences in performance. We included the conventional battery cage system and the following loose housing systems: single and multi-tiered barn systems, single and multi-tiered free range systems, and single and multi-tiered organic systems. Ecological indicators used were deduced from a life cycle assessment, and were: global warming potential, energy use, land occupation, fossil phosphorus use, acidification potential, nitrogen and phosphorus deficit, and nitrogen and phosphorus surplus, each expressed per kg of egg. Economic indicator used was net farm income per full time employee. Based on our ecological evaluation of Dutch egg production systems, we predict that a ban on battery cages in the European Union will increase global warming potential, land occupation and acidification potential per kg of egg produced, whereas the effect on energy use, fossil phosphorus use, nitrogen and phosphorus deficit, and nitrogen and phosphorus surplus depends on relative importance of different loose housing systems. Of all loose housing systems, organic systems had lowest global warming potential, energy use, fossil phosphorus use, and nitrogen and phosphorus surplus, whereas land occupation and nitrogen and phosphorus deficit was lowest for barn systems. Acidification potential was lowest for a multi-tiered barn system. Differences in LCA results among production systems can be explained mainly by differences; in feed conversion, in parameters that determine ecological impact per kg feed ingredient (e.g., crop yield per ha; number field operations, type and amount of fertilization), in drying of grain, in transport of concentrates and manure, in type of hen house and in N excretion per hen per year. Free range systems had highest net farm income, followed by organic systems. Multi-tiered systems had a higher net farm income than single-tiered systems. In case differences among egg and cost prices of different systems do not change after a ban on the battery cage, multitiered free range and organic systems are economically most favourable
机译:预计欧盟即将颁布的禁止电池笼的禁令将导致畜牧业系统从主要的电池笼转变为浓缩的笼和宽松的住房系统,例如谷仓,自由放养和有机系统。为了深入了解这种禁令的生态和经济后果,我们对荷兰最常用的鸡蛋生产系统的生态和经济表现进行了量化,并确定了哪些参数可以解释这种表现的差异。我们包括常规的电池笼系统和以下松散的住房系统:单层和多层谷仓系统,单层和多层自由放养系统以及单层和多层有机系统。所使用的生态指标是根据生命周期评估得出的,它们是:全球变暖潜能,能源利用,土地占用,化石磷的利用,酸化潜力,氮和磷的缺乏以及氮和磷的过量,每千克鸡蛋表示。使用的经济指标是每位全职员工的农业净收入。根据我们对荷兰鸡蛋生产系统的生态评估,我们预测,欧盟禁止使用电池笼,每千克生产的鸡蛋会增加全球变暖潜力,土地占用和酸化潜力,而对能源使用,化石磷的使用产生影响,氮和磷的亏缺以及氮和磷的过剩取决于不同松散住房系统的相对重要性。在所有松散的住房系统中,有机系统具有最低的全球变暖潜能,能源使用,化石磷的使用以及氮和磷的过剩,而谷仓系统的土地占用和氮磷缺乏量最低。多层谷仓系统的酸化潜力最低。生产系统之间LCA结果的差异可以用差异来解释。在饲料转化中,在确定每公斤饲料成分对生态的影响的参数(例如,每公顷作物产量;田间作业的数量,施肥的类型和数量),谷物干燥中,浓缩物和肥料的运输中,鸡舍类型中以及每年每只母鸡的排泄量N。自由放养系统的农业净收入最高,其次是有机系统。多层系统的农业净收入高于单层系统。如果禁止电池笼后不同系统的鸡蛋和成本之间的价格差异没有变化,则多层自由放养和有机系统在经济上是最有利的

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号