...
首页> 外文期刊>Livestock Science >Assessment of environmental effects, animal welfare and milk quality among organic dairy farms.
【24h】

Assessment of environmental effects, animal welfare and milk quality among organic dairy farms.

机译:对有机奶牛场的环境影响,动物福利和牛奶质量进行评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Within the organic dairy farming sector in Germany, traditional mixed farms with relatively low yearly milk yields of around 6000 kg per cow exist beside highly specialised grassland based farms with more than 9000 kg milk yield per cow and year. Specialisation and intensification are discussed critically within the organic sector as negative environmental effects are expected. In this study the potential environmental impacts of four different types of organic dairy farms are compared, based on a survey of 27 organic dairy farms classified by a percentage of grassland on total farm area and feeding intensity. The analysed environmental impact categories were energy consumption, climate impact, land demand, ammonia emissions, nitrate leaching, conservation of soil fertility, biodiversity, animal welfare and milk quality. Farms with a high feeding intensity tended to show ecological advantages in the impact categories climate impact and land demand. In contrast, low-input farm types showed positive environmental effects in the impact categories animal welfare, milk quality and ammonia losses. In an overall environmental index, the farm type 'low-input mixed farming' showed the best results. The hypothesis that farms orientated on the traditional principles of organic farming tend to have less negative environmental effects even within the range of organic dairy farms is hereby confirmed. However, further research is needed to affirm the methodology used to quantify the environmental effects in the categories of animal welfare and milk quality. The results show that focussing only on the classical environmental impact categories, e.g. energy consumption and climate impact, may lead to different results than a more complex system approach that considers a broader range of relevant impacts and ecological benefits
机译:在德国的有机奶牛养殖部门中,除了高度专业化的草原养殖场以外,还有传统的混合农场,年产奶量相对较低,每头奶牛约6000公斤,每头奶牛和年产奶量超过9000公斤。由于预期会对环境造成负面影响,因此在有机行业内对专业化和集约化进行了严格的讨论。在这项研究中,根据对27个有机奶牛场的调查进行了比较,比较了四种不同类型的有机奶牛场对环境的潜在影响,这些牧场按草地占农场总面积和饲养强度的百分比进行分类。分析的环境影响类别为能源消耗,气候影响,土地需求,氨气排放,硝酸盐淋失,土壤肥力保持,生物多样性,动物福利和牛奶质量。高饲喂强度的农场在气候影响和土地需求等影响类别中往往表现出生态优势。相反,低投入农场类型在动物福利,牛奶质量和氨损失等影响类别中显示出积极的环境影响。在总体环境指数中,“低投入混合种植”农场类型表现最佳。从而证实了以有机耕作的传统原理为导向的农场的假说,即使在有机奶牧场的范围内,对环境的负面影响也较小。但是,需要进一步的研究来确认用于量化动物福利和牛奶质量类别中的环境影响的方法。结果表明,仅关注经典的环境影响类别,例如能源消耗和气候影响可能会导致结果不同,而更复杂的系统方法会考虑更广泛的相关影响和生态效益

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号