...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Solitary pulmonary nodules: determining the likelihood of malignancy with neural network analysis.
【24h】

Solitary pulmonary nodules: determining the likelihood of malignancy with neural network analysis.

机译:孤立性肺结节:通过神经网络分析确定恶性肿瘤的可能性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To test a neural network in differentiation of benign from malignant solitary pulmonary nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Neural networks were trained and tested on the characteristics of 318 nodules. Predictive accuracy of the network was judged for calibration and discrimination. Network results were compared with those with a simpler Bayesian method. RESULTS: The Brier score was 0.142 (calibration, 0.003; discrimination, 0.139) for the neural network and 0.133 for the Bayesian analysis (calibration, 0.012; discrimination, 0.121). Analysis of the calibration curve revealed no significant difference (P < .05) between the slope (b = 1.09) and the line of identity (b = 1) for the neural network or the Bayesian analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.871 for the neural network and 0.894 for the Bayesian analysis (P < .05). There were 23 and 21 false-positive predictions and 18 and six false-negative predictions for the neural network and Bayesian analysis, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Bayesian method was better than the neural network in prediction of probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules.
机译:目的:测试一个神经网络,以区分良性和恶性孤立性肺结节。材料与方法:对318个结核的特征进行了神经网络训练和测试。判断网络的预测准确性以进行校准和判别。网络结果与使用简单贝叶斯方法的结果进行了比较。结果:神经网络的Brier得分为0.142(校正,0.003;辨别力,0.139),贝叶斯分析的Brier评分为0.133(校正,0.012,辨别力,0.121)。校准曲线的分析表明,对于神经网络或贝叶斯分析,斜率(b = 1.09)与等值线(b = 1)之间没有显着差异(P <.05)。对于神经网络,接收器工作特性曲线下的面积为0.871,对于贝叶斯分析,则为0.894(P <.05)。对于神经网络和贝叶斯分析,分别有23个和21个假阳性预测以及18个和6个假阴性预测。结论:贝叶斯方法在预测孤立性肺结节恶性可能性方面优于神经网络。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号