首页> 外文期刊>Livestock Science >Days to calving in artificially inseminated cattle: Alternative models and analyses
【24h】

Days to calving in artificially inseminated cattle: Alternative models and analyses

机译:人工授精牛的产犊天数:替代模型和分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Investigations by Robinson [Robinson, D.L., 2007. Days to calving in artificially inseminated cattle: comparison of potential traits. Livestock Science 110, 174-180] concluded that the most useful trait for assessing fertility of artificially inseminated (AI) beef cows is AI days to calving (AIDC), a trait that mimics days to calving for naturally mated cows. Various fixed and random effects were fitted to AIDC to determine the best way of modelling lactation status of the cow, the effect of service sire, using smaller contemporary groups and lowering the penalty value for non-calvers. Fitting the time interval between calving and the start of mating either as a 10-level factor or a cubic spline function explained considerably more variation than fitting the standard 2-level factor (wet or dry). Estimated permanent environmental effects of the cow were considerably reduced. This suggests that, if a cow calves late in the season (less than 60 days before she is inseminated), her fertility is reduced. Models should therefore account for this effect. If fitted, service sire explained 1.6% of phenotypic variation, compared to a much larger sirexcontemporary group interaction (3% of phenotypic variation). It is therefore important to account for sirexcontemporary group interactions. When the fertility of service sires is not being evaluated, service sires could be incorporated into the definition of contemporary groups. Ideally, breeders should be encouraged to formally record contemporary (or mating) groups. Reducing the size of contemporary groups (inferred from the data) by limiting the time interval between first and last inseminations from 120 to 60 days had only a marginal effect as did reducing the penalty for non-calvers from 21 to 10 days.
机译:Robinson的研究[Robinson,D.L.,2007年。人工授精牛的产犊天数:潜在性状比较。 [Livestock Science 110,174-180]得出结论,评估人工授精(AI)肉牛的育性最有用的特征是产犊的AI天数(AIDC),该特征模仿自然交配的母牛产犊的天数。各种固定和随机效应都适用于AIDC,以确定模拟母牛泌乳状态的最佳方法,服务公牛的效应,使用较小的当代群体并降低非犊牛的惩罚值。用10级因子或三次样条函数拟合产犊和开始交配之间的时间间隔比拟合标准2级因子(湿或干)能说明更多的变化。估计对奶牛的永久环境影响已大大降低。这表明,如果一头母牛在产季末(在受精前不到60天)产犊,那么其生育能力就会降低。因此,模型应说明这种影响。如果适合的话,服务父亲解释了1.6%的表型变异,相比之下,与之同时代的群体之间的互动要大得多(表型变异为3%)。因此,重要的是要考虑当代群体之间的互动。如果不评估公职人员的生育能力,则可以将公职人员纳入现代群体的定义中。理想情况下,应鼓励育种者正式记录当代(或交配)群体。通过将第一次和最后一次授精之间的时间间隔从120天减少到60天来减少当代人群的规模(从数据中推断),只是产生了边际效果,将非产犊的惩罚从21天减少到了10天。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号