首页> 外文学位 >The comparison of random regression test day models and a 305-day model for evaluation of milk yield in dairy cattle
【24h】

The comparison of random regression test day models and a 305-day model for evaluation of milk yield in dairy cattle

机译:评估乳牛产奶量的随机回归测试日模型和305天模型的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis is an investigation of the effect of using 305-day or random regression test day models to estimate breeding values for milk yield, on the accuracy of estimated breeding values. Test day milk yields were simulated to an existing data structure and used to obtain simulated 305-day milk yields. Simulated milk yields were analyzed using 305-day models and five random regression test day models based on different mathematical functions to describe daily milk yields. Estimated breeding values from each of these models were compared to simulated breeding values. This sequence was replicated ten times. Parameters needed for simulation and estimation of breeding values were estimated from actual Jersey test day yields.;Random regression test day models resulted in estimated breeding values for 305-day milk yield which were more accurate than breeding values from 305-day models. Using random regression test day models based on mathematical functions with five instead of three parameters did not improve accuracy of estimated breeding values for 305-day yields. If the only aim is to improve accuracy of breeding values for 305-day yields, then random regression models using functions with three parameters are sufficient.;Random regression test day models resulted in breeding values for daily yields and persistency which were accurate enough to be used for selection. Using random regression test day models based on mathematical functions with four or five instead of three parameters improved accuracy of estimated breeding values for daily yields and persistency. If daily or persistency breeding values are of interest, then a random regression model with five (or more) parameters should be used.;Ignoring environmental covariances when estimating parameters for test day models resulted in overestimated genetic variances. Environmental covariances should be properly modeled in test day models to remove this bias. Environmental covariances caused a small reduction in the accuracy of estimated breeding values when these covariances were not properly modelled.
机译:本文研究了使用305天或随机回归测试日模型来估计奶产量的育种值对估计育种值准确性的影响。将测试日奶产量模拟为现有数据结构,并用于获得模拟的305天奶产量。基于不同的数学函数,使用305天模型和五个随机回归测试日模型对模拟的牛奶产量进行了分析,以描述每日的牛奶产量。将来自每个模型的估计育种值与模拟育种值进行比较。该序列重复十次。从泽西测试日的实际产量估算和估算育种值所需的参数。随机回归测试日模型得出的305天产奶量的估算育种值比305天模型的育种值更准确。使用基于数学函数的随机回归试验日模型,该模型具有五个参数而不是三个参数,不能提高305天产量的估计育种值的准确性。如果唯一的目的是提高305天产量的育种值的准确性,则使用具有三个参数的函数进行随机回归模型就足够了;随机回归测试日模型得出的每日产量和持久性育种值足够准确用于选择。使用基于数学函数的随机回归测试日模型,该数学模型具有四个或五个而不是三个参数,从而提高了每日产量和持久性的估计育种值的准确性。如果感兴趣的是每日或持久性育种值,则应使用具有五个(或多个)参数的随机回归模型。当估计测试日模型的参数时,忽略环境协方差会导致高估了遗传方差。在测试日模型中应正确建模环境协方差,以消除这种偏差。当这些协方差没有正确建模时,环境协方差会导致估计育种值准确性的小幅下降。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kistemaker, Gerrit Jan.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Guelph (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Guelph (Canada).;
  • 学科 Animal sciences.;Genetics.;Biostatistics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 181 p.
  • 总页数 181
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:49:15

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号