首页> 外文期刊>Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies >Multi-indicator Evaluation and Analysis of Coordinated Industrial Development of Urban Agglomerations
【24h】

Multi-indicator Evaluation and Analysis of Coordinated Industrial Development of Urban Agglomerations

机译:城市群产业协同发展多指标评价分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The level of coordinated industrial development in a region is considered as an important factor of measuring the construction of urban agglomerations. As the economic development patterns and stages vary in regions, a single-standard evaluation system is generally insufficient in evaluating and analyzing the coordinated industrial development of urban agglomerations. This paper, with multivariate values and diversified development demands considered, quantitatively describes the industrial development of urban agglomerations from four dimensions: economics, specialization, balance, and friendliness. On this basis, it synthesizes the indicator parameters effectively and proposes a multi-indicator evaluation model. Through the model, the paper comparatively analyzes the present status and development course of coordinated industrial development of typical urban agglomerations (Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei urban agglomeration, the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, and the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration) in China. The results show that Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei urban agglomeration has the clearest division of industries, but its industrial spillover effect is limited, the industrial structure of small and medium cities is too simple, and the economic gap among cities narrows at a very slow rate. The core cities in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration exert certain driving effect upon the economy of their surrounding areas. However, they hardly give full play to their comparative advantages due to a low level of regional integration and high industrial similarity among cities. Compared with the above two urban agglomerations, the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration enjoys more reasonable division of industries among cities, significant driving effect of core cities, and higher level of coordinated industrial development as driven by the market economy.
机译:一个地区的产业协调发展水平被认为是衡量城市群建设的重要因素。由于各地区经济发展格局和阶段各不相同,单一标准的评价体系对城市群产业协调发展的评价和分析普遍不足。本文考虑了多元价值和多样化发展需求,从经济性、专业化、平衡性、友好性四个维度定量描述了城市群的产业发展。在此基础上,对指标参数进行有效综合,提出多指标评价模型。通过该模型,比较分析了我国典型城市群(京津冀城市群、长三角城市群、珠三角城市群)产业协同发展的现状和发展历程。结果表明:京津冀城市群产业分工最为明显,但产业溢出效应有限,中小城市产业结构过于简单,城际经济差距缩小速度较慢。长三角城市群的核心城市对周边地区经济具有一定的带动作用。然而,由于区域一体化程度低,城市间产业相似性高,难以充分发挥比较优势。与上述两个城市群相比,珠三角城市群在市场经济的带动下,产业划分更加合理,核心城市带动作用显著,产业协调发展水平更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号