首页> 外文期刊>Life sciences >The human formyl peptide receptor as model system for constitutively active G-protein-coupled receptors.
【24h】

The human formyl peptide receptor as model system for constitutively active G-protein-coupled receptors.

机译:人甲酰肽受体作为组成型活性G蛋白偶联受体的模型系统。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

According to the two-state model of G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activation, GPCRs isomerize from an inactive (R) state to an active (R*) state. In the R* state, GPCRs activate G-proteins. Agonist-independent R/R* isomerization is referred to as constitutive activity and results in an increase in basal G-protein activity, i.e. GDP/GTP exchange. Agonists stabilize the R* state and further increase, whereas inverse agonists stabilize the R state and decrease, basal G-protein activity. Constitutive activity is observed in numerous wild-type GPCRs and disease-causing GPCR mutants with increased constitutive activity. The human formyl peptide receptor (FPR) exists in several isoforms (FPR-26, FPR-98 and FPR-G6) and activates chemotaxis and cytotoxic cell functions of phagocytes through G(i)-proteins. Studies in HL-60 leukemia cell membranes demonstrated inhibitory effects of Na(+) and pertussis toxin on basal G(i)-protein activity, suggesting that the FPR is constitutively active. However, since HL-60 cells express several constitutively active chemoattractant receptors, analysis of constitutive FPR activity was difficult. Sf9 insect cells do not express chemoattractant receptors and G(i)-proteins and provide a sensitive reconstitution system for FPR/G(i)-protein coupling. Such expression studies showed that FPR-26 is much more constitutively active than FPR-98 and FPR-G6 as assessed by the relative inhibitory effects of Na(+) and of the inverse agonist cyclosporin H on basal G(i)-protein activity. Site-directed mutagenesis studies suggest that the E346A exchange in the C-terminus critically determines dimerization and constitutive activity of FPR. Moreover, N-glycosylation of the N-terminus seems to be important for constitutive FPR activity. Finally, we discuss some future directions of research.
机译:根据G蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)激活的两个状态模型,GPCR从非活动(R)状态异构化为活动(R *)状态。在R *状态下,GPCR激活G蛋白。不依赖激动剂的R / R *异构化被称为本构活性,并导致基础G蛋白活性增加,即GDP / GTP交换。激动剂使R *状态稳定并进一步增加,而反向激动剂使R状态稳定并减少基础G蛋白活性。在许多野生型GPCR和具有增加的本构活性的致病GPCR突变体中观察到本构活性。人甲酰肽受体(FPR)存在几种同种型(FPR-26,FPR-98和FPR-G6),并通过G(i)蛋白激活吞噬细胞的趋化性和细胞毒性细胞功能。在HL-60白血病细胞膜上的研究表明,Na(+)和百日咳毒素对基础G(i)蛋白活性具有抑制作用,表明FPR具有组成性活性。但是,由于HL-60细胞表达了几种组成型活性趋化因子受体,因此难以分析组成型FPR活性。 Sf9昆虫细胞不表达趋化因子受体和G(i)-蛋白,并且为FPR / G(i)-蛋白偶联提供了灵敏的重建系统。此类表达研究表明,通过Na(+)和反向激动剂环孢菌素H对基础G(i)蛋白质活性的相对抑制作用,可以评估FPR-26的构成活性远高于FPR-98和FPR-G6。定点诱变研究表明,C末端的E346A交换决定了FPR的二聚化和组成活性。而且,N端的N-糖基化对于组成型FPR活性似乎很重要。最后,我们讨论了一些未来的研究方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号