首页> 外文期刊>Northern Journal of Applied Forestry >Surface compaction estimates and soil sensitivity in aspen stands of the Great Lakes States.
【24h】

Surface compaction estimates and soil sensitivity in aspen stands of the Great Lakes States.

机译:大湖国家白杨林的表面压实度估算和土壤敏感性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aspen forests in the Great Lakes States (USA) support much of the regional timber industry. Management-induced soil compaction is a concern because it affects forest health and productivity and soil erosion. Soil compaction increases bulk density and soil strength and can also decrease air and water movement into and through the soil profile. Currently, most inventories, and specifically the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) programme, use qualitative estimates of soil compaction. This study compared qualitative estimates with quantitative measurements on aspen (Populus grandidentata and P. tremuloides) clearcuts in five national forests (Chequamegon-Nicolet in Wisconsin, Huron-Manistee and Ottawa in Michigan, and Chippewa and Superior in Minnesota) in the Great Lakes States region. Research sites were stratified into classes of high and low potential for soil compaction on the basis of soil texture. Qualitative visual assessments of compaction were made according to FIA phase 3 protocols and compared with physical measurements of bulk density, soil compression strength, and saturated hydraulic conductivity. No differences in compaction between high- and low-risk soils were detected using visual assessments, but quantitative measurements in high-risk, fine-textured soils indicated greater compaction than low-risk, coarse-textured soils. These results illustrate shortcomings in qualitative estimates of compaction made according to FIA phase 3 field protocols. Inexpensive quantitative measurements, such as those taken with a pocket penetrometer, may be sufficient to quantify compaction levels within the plots.
机译:大湖州(美国)的白杨林为许多区域木材工业提供了支持。管理引起的土壤压实是一个令人关注的问题,因为它会影响森林健康,生产力和土壤侵蚀。土壤压实增加了堆积密度和土壤强度,还可以减少空气和水进入和穿过土壤剖面的运动。当前,大多数清单,特别是森林清单和分析(FIA)计划都使用土壤压实度的定性估算。这项研究将定性估计与定量测量结果进行了比较,对五个大森林国家(威斯康星州的Chequamegon-Nicolet,密歇根州的休伦-马尼斯蒂和渥太华,明尼苏达州的奇珀瓦和优等)的白杨(杨木和tremuloides)截留物进行了定量测量。地区。根据土壤质地,将研究地点分为高和低土壤压实潜力类别。根据FIA第3阶段协议对压实进行了定性的视觉评估,并与堆积密度,土壤抗压强度和饱和水力传导率的物理测量结果进行了比较。使用目测评估未发现高风险和低风险土壤之间的压实度差异,但对高风险,细纹理土壤进行定量测量表明,压实度高于低风险,粗纹理土壤。这些结果说明了根据国际汽联第3阶段现场协议对压实进行定性评估的缺点。廉价的定量测量(例如使用口袋式渗透仪进行的测量)可能足以量化图中的压实水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号