...
首页> 外文期刊>Career Development International: The Journal for Executives, Consultants and Academics >Expatriate assignments vs localization of management in China: Staffing choices of Australian and German companies
【24h】

Expatriate assignments vs localization of management in China: Staffing choices of Australian and German companies

机译:外派人员分配与中国本地化管理:澳大利亚和德国公司的人员配备选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the specific difficulties that senior managers face when employing expatriate, Chinese and local-hired foreign managers in China-based subsidiaries of Western multinational companies (MNCs). Furthermore, it aims to examine the resultant coping strategies to overcome identified weaknesses. Design/methodology/approach - This research adopts a qualitative approach, using semi-structured interviews with key-informants from senior management in 44 Australian and German companies operating in China. Findings - The study identified specific difficulties associated with the employment of expatriate, local Chinese, and local-hired foreign managers in Australian and German subsidiaries in China. The interviewees indicate a widespread intention to replace expatriate managers with Chinese managers and local-hired foreign managers. The striving for localization of staffing is more pronounced in German than Australian MNCs. German companies offer more comprehensive development activities for the Chinese talent than Australian companies. Research limitations/implications - The small number of participants and the restriction to one key informant per company limit the generalizability of the findings. The effects of different staffing options still need to be researched in longitudinal studies and in varied contexts. Practical implications - Localization of staff suggests the need for specific, culture-sensitive approaches to personnel development. The findings also suggest that the knowledge transfer between expatriate and local managers deserves more attention. Finally, the return on investment that companies receive from differing staffing options should be assessed using a multidimensional set of success criteria. Originality/value - This paper has two main contributions to existing research. First, it links academic discussion about the options of international staffing with the experience of practitioners from Western MNCs operating in China. Second, it provides further support for the existence of country-of-origin effects in international staffing.
机译:目的-本文的目的是探讨高级管理人员在西方跨国公司(MNC)在中国的子公司聘用外籍,中国和本地雇用的外国管理人员时面临的具体困难。此外,它旨在研究由此产生的应对策略,以克服已发现的弱点。设计/方法/方法-这项研究采用定性方法,对来自在中国运营的44家澳大利亚和德国公司的高级管理人员进行了半结构化访谈。调查结果-该研究确定了在澳大利亚和德国在中国的子公司中聘用外籍,中国本地人和当地雇用的外国经理人时遇到的特殊困难。受访者表示,广泛的意图是用中国经理和当地雇用的外国经理代替外派经理。与澳大利亚的跨国公司相比,德语中对人员配备本地化的努力更为明显。与澳大利亚公司相比,德国公司为中国人才提供了更全面的发展活动。研究的局限性/含义-参与者人数少,并且每个公司只允许一名关键信息提供者,这限制了研究结果的推广性。仍然需要在纵向研究和不同背景下研究不同人员配置方案的影响。实际意义-工作人员的本地化表明需要采用特定的,对文化敏感的方法来发展人员。研究结果还表明,外派人员与当地管理人员之间的知识转移值得更多关注。最后,应使用一套成功的多维标准来评估公司从不同的人员配置选项中获得的投资回报率。原创性/价值-本文对现有研究有两个主要贡献。首先,它将有关国际人员配置选择的学术讨论与西方跨国公司在中国开展业务的从业者的经验联系起来。第二,它为国际人员配备中存在国别效应提供了进一步的支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号