【24h】

Sociological study on implementation of animal health plans in organic farming.

机译:在有机农业中实施动物卫生计划的社会学研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Organic farming states to have a high animal welfare level. Animal health is an important parameter. Several studies show, that there are severe deficits. Significant deficits in animal health related to a broad range of problems. The study (2006 to 2008) on 20 organic dairy cow, 20 pig and 20 laying hen farms confirmed these results. But the situation among the different farms varies greatly. It is however apparent that a number of farms demonstrate good animal health over a long period of time. The project shows that animal health must be defined as a central management task and that solutions must be found by the actors, starting with the farm managers. Animal health plans with a participative approach are suited as an instrument to improve health on individual farms. A farm's situation depends, however, on management and many other factors, not necessarily connected with animal husbandry (overwork, information, financial possibilities, personal and business situations and priorities, and finally, unknown factors). Not all livestock farms were ready to put more effort than a certain level for better animal health. Particularly the large farms had problems with participation and left the project before its conclusion. It could be found that there are large differences in the subjective and objective consideration of animal health for farmers, consultants/veterinarians and scientists. Farmers mentioned that they first became aware of their problems through the animal health check. But solutions were seldom sought. More motivation for improvement could first be generated with proven economic significance ("Sick animals perform less"). In the case of laying hens, poor health is not necessarily connected to poorer economic performance ("Even hens without feathers lay eggs").
机译:有机农业规定动物福利水平高。动物健康是一个重要参数。多项研究表明,存在严重的赤字。动物健康的重大缺陷与许多问题有关。对20头有机奶牛,20头猪和20头蛋鸡场的研究(2006年至2008年)证实了这些结果。但是不同农场之间的情况差异很大。但是很明显,许多农场在很长一段时间内都表现出良好的动物健康。该项目表明,必须将动物健康定义为一项中央管理任务,并且行动者必须从农场管理者开始找到解决方案。具有参与性方法的动物健康计划适合作为改善单个农场健康的工具。但是,农场的状况取决于管理和许多其他因素,而这些因素不一定与畜牧业有关(劳累,信息,财务可能性,个人和业务状况以及优先事项,最后还有未知因素)。并非所有畜牧场都愿意为提高动物健康水平而付出超过一定水平的努力。特别是大型农场在参与方面存在问题,因此在项目结束前就离开了。可以发现,在农民,顾问/兽医和科学家对动物健康的主观和客观考虑方面存在很大差异。农民提到他们首先通过动物健康检查意识到了自己的问题。但是很少寻求解决方案。首先可以产生具有经证实的经济意义的更大的改进动力(“病畜的表现要差”)。就产蛋鸡而言,健康状况未必与较差的经济表现有关(“即使没有羽毛的母鸡也会产卵”)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号