首页> 外文期刊>Land Use Policy >Agro-pastoralism under climate change: Institutions and local climate adaptations in northern China
【24h】

Agro-pastoralism under climate change: Institutions and local climate adaptations in northern China

机译:气候变化下的农牧业:中国北方的制度与地方气候适应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The livelihoods of resource-dependent peoples are vulnerable to climate variability. This study focuses on how local climate adaptations, which have been sustained through long-term interactions with local ecologies, have changed in the face of the challenges caused by climate change and policy interventions. Case studies were conducted in two agro-pastoral counties of northern China, a region that confronts frequent drought and that has experienced extensive institutional changes over recent decades. Based on the exploration of four adaptation strategies, the field results show that both counties have experienced an acceleration of livelihood diversification, an increase in storage and market exchanges, and a dramatic reduction in previously common pooling. The findings reveal that these adaptations are not a direct result of coping with climate risks but rather are indicative of livelihood strategies that result from the combined impacts of institutional, socioeconomic and climatic changes. Current institutional arrangements have negative impacts on local climate adaptations. This is particularly true for those with limited livelihood options, and such arrangements may therefore foster an increase in inequality with regard to household adaptive capacities over the long term. Therefore, this study recommends flexible policies that facilitate local arrangements rather than the current one-for-all policy. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:资源依赖型民族的生计易受气候变化的影响。这项研究的重点是面对气候变化和政策干预所带来的挑战,通过与当地生态的长期互动而得以维持的局部气候适应如何发生了变化。在中国北方的两个农牧县开展了案例研究,该县经常干旱,近几十年来经历了广泛的制度变革。在对四种适应策略的探索基础上,实地结果表明,两个县都经历了生计多样化的加速,存储和市场交流的增加以及以前共同池的急剧减少。研究结果表明,这些适应措施并不是应对气候风险的直接结果,而是表明制度,社会经济和气候变化综合影响所产生的谋生策略。当前的体制安排对当地的气候适应有负面影响。对于那些生计选择有限的人来说尤其如此,因此从长远来看,这种安排可能会加剧家庭适应能力方面的不平等。因此,本研究建议采用灵活的政策来促进地方安排,而不是当前的“一劳永逸”政策。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号