首页> 外文期刊>Land Economics >Rural land use: traditional agriculture or forestry?
【24h】

Rural land use: traditional agriculture or forestry?

机译:农村土地利用:传统农业还是林业?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The signing of the Kyoto Protocol and the official recognition of forestry's capacity to sequester carbon has prompted considerable interest, within the European Union, in forestry as a competing land use application. However, despite large increases in grants to forestry, afforestation rates, in certain EU countries, are below national targets. In this paper, a real options model is employed to theoretically explain why farmers may be slow to switch land from traditional agriculture to forestry. The theoretical model is then used to motivate an empirical dynamic panel data model and both models are applied to Irish data. Results indicate that the Irish government would need to increase the ratio of profits from forestry to those of traditional agriculture by approximately 14% to give farmers the incentive to increase the number of hectares planted from 14 000 per annum to the government target of 20 000 per annum..
机译:《京都议定书》的签署以及对森林封存碳能力的官方认可,促使欧盟内部对林业作为一种竞争性的土地利用应用产生了浓厚的兴趣。然而,尽管对林业的拨款大大增加,但在某些欧盟国家中,造林率仍低于国家目标。在本文中,采用实物期权模型从理论上解释了为什么农民从传统农业转向林业的过程中农民可能会变慢。然后,将理论模型用于激发经验动态面板数据模型,并将这两个模型都应用于爱尔兰数据。结果表明,爱尔兰政府需要将林业与传统农业的利润比率提高约14%,以激励农民将种植的公顷数从每年的1.4万增加到政府设定的每公顷2万的目标年..

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号