...
首页> 外文期刊>Cardiovascular therapeutics >The Effect of a Cardiovascular Polypill Strategy on Pill Burden
【24h】

The Effect of a Cardiovascular Polypill Strategy on Pill Burden

机译:心血管息肉策略对药丸负担的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Aims: Recent trials of cardiovascular polypills in high-risk populations show improvements in the use of cardiovascular preventive treatments, compared to usual care. We describe patterns of pill burden in Australian practice, define the impact of polypill therapy on pill burden, and explore how physicians add medication to polypill therapy. Methods: The Kanyini Guidelines Adherence with the Polypill Study was an open-label trial involving 623 participants in Australia which randomized participants to a polypill strategy (containing a statin, antiplatelet agent, and two blood-pressure-lowering medications) or usual care. Participants either had established cardiovascular disease or were at high calculated risk (15% over 5years). Current medications, daily pill burden, and self-reported use of combination treatment were recorded prior to randomization and at study end. Median pill burden at baseline and study end was compared in both arms. Subgroup analysis of the polypill strategy on trial primary outcomes was conducted by pill burden at baseline. Results: Median total and cardiovascular pill burdens of the polypill group decreased from 7 to 5 and from 4 to 2, respectively (median change -2; IQR -3, 0), with no change in the usual care group (comparison of change; P<0.001). No change was seen for noncardiovascular medications. Of those still using the polypill at study end, 43.8% were prescribed additional medications; 84.5% of these additional medications were blood-pressure-lowering medications. Within the polypill group, lower pill burden at baseline was associated with greater increases in the use of indicated cardiovascular preventive medications at study end compared to those with higher pill burdens. No trend was observed between the level of baseline pill burden and the effect of poylpill treatment on systolic blood pressure or total cholesterol. Conclusion: A cardiovascular polypill in contemporary Australian practice reduces cardiovascular and total pill burdens, despite frequent prescription of additional medications.
机译:目的:最近在高危人群中使用心血管息肉丸的试验表明,与常规治疗相比,心血管疾病预防性治疗的使用有所改善。我们描述了澳大利亚实践中的药丸负担模式,定义了多药丸治疗对药丸负担的影响,并探讨了医生如何在多药丸治疗中添加药物。方法:《卡尼尼指南与多药治疗的依从性》是一项开放性试验,涉及澳大利亚的623名参与者,该研究将参与者随机分配为多药策略(含他汀类药物,抗血小板药和两种降压药)或常规护理。参与者已经患有心血管疾病或处于较高的计算风险中(五年内占15%)。在随机分组之前和研究结束时记录当前的药物,每日药丸负担和自我报告的联合治疗使用情况。比较两组患者基线和研究结束时的中位药丸负担。通过基线时的药丸负荷对试验的主要结局进行多药丸策略的亚组分析。结果:多药丸组的中位总和心血管药物负担分别从7降低到5,从4降低到2(中位数变化-2; IQR -3,0),而常规护理组则没有变化(变化的对比; P <0.001)。非心血管药物未见变化。在研究结束时仍在使用复方药物的患者中,有43.8%的患者被处方开了其他药物;这些额外药物中有84.5%是降血压药物。在多药丸组中,与较高的药丸负担者相比,基线时较低的药丸负担与研究结束时指定心血管预防药物的使用增加更多有关。在基线药丸负荷水平和poylpill治疗对收缩压或总胆固醇的影响之间没有观察到趋势。结论:尽管经常开处方额外的药物,但在当代澳大利亚实践中,心血管息肉药可减少心血管和总药丸负担。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号