首页> 外文期刊>Noise & vibration bulletin >EVALUATING ROADSIDE NOISE BARRIERS USING AN ANNOYANCE REDUCTION CRITERION
【24h】

EVALUATING ROADSIDE NOISE BARRIERS USING AN ANNOYANCE REDUCTION CRITERION

机译:使用减少干扰标准评估路边噪声障碍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The effectiveness of noise barriers is typically assessed as the reduction in A-weighted sound pressure level (LA). This research indicates that this may not be a valid indicator of the corresponding annoyance reduction. Road traffic noise was recorded behind a noise barrier (barrier sounds) and at a location with no barrier (non-barrier sounds). The barrier sounds, recorded 10-45 m from the road, and nonbarrier sounds recorded 50-200 m from the road were of similar LA. Despite this, participants in a listening experiment found the barrier sounds to be more annoying than the non-barrier sounds, an annoyance-difference corresponding to a 3-dB increase in LA. The Loudness level (ISO 532B) and a low-frequency corrected sound pressure level (L A) were found to be better than LA as indicators of the barrier's annoyance-reduction efficiency.
机译:隔音屏障的有效性通常以A加权声压级(LA)的降低来评估。这项研究表明,这可能不是减少相应烦恼的有效指标。道路交通噪音记录在隔音屏障的后面(障碍声)和无障碍的位置(无障碍声)。距离道路10-45 m处记录的障碍声和距离道路50-200 m处记录的无障碍声类似的LA。尽管如此,参加听觉实验的参与者发现屏障声音比非屏障声音更令人讨厌,其烦恼差异与LA的3 dB增加相对应。发现响度水平(ISO 532B)和低频校正的声压水平(LA)优于LA,可作为屏障减少烦恼的指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号