...
首页> 外文期刊>Langenbeck's archives of surgery >Marginal effects of regional intra-arterial chemotherapy as an alternative treatment option in advanced pancreatic carcinoma.
【24h】

Marginal effects of regional intra-arterial chemotherapy as an alternative treatment option in advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

机译:区域性动脉内化疗作为晚期胰腺癌的替代治疗方法的边际效应。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Locoregional intra-arterial (i.a.) chemotherapy may provide high levels of cytostatic concentrations within the tumour and, simultaneously, a low rate of systemic side effects compared with systemic administration of anti-neoplastic drugs. In addition, this may lead to an increase of tumour response rate and prolongation of survival time. The aim of the study was (1) to evaluate the benefit of an i.a. infusion of cytostatic drugs via the coeliac trunk on tumour response rate and survival time, (2) to elucidate problems and risks, and finally (3) to achieve an improvement of overall therapeutic management in pancreatic carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 22 patients (12 female; 10 male; mean age 57.1 years) with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma, which was confirmed by histopathology, i.a. chemotherapy was administered. Through a catheter, which was inserted via the femoral artery by the Seldinger technique and placed with the tip in the coeliac trunk, two different drug combinations were given. Group A ( n=12) were given a bolus injection of a mixture (chemo-occlusion) consisting of amilomer (Spherex) and epirubicin (Farmorubicin) followed by short-time infusion of folic acid and 24-h infusion of 5-FU. Group B ( n=10) were given treatment over 5 days: mitoxantrone (Novantrone, day [d] 1), 5-FU and folic acid (Haemato-folin, d 2-4), and cisplatin (d 5). Treatment was repeated in both groups every 4 weeks. Tumour response was assessed by computed tomography every 8 weeks. RESULTS: In group A, there was one complete and one partial remission, resulting in a remission rate of 16.6%. Two patients showed stable disease, while in two-thirds of the patients ( n=8), progressive disease was found. Median survival time was 3 months; 1-year survival rate was 33.3% (4 of 12 patients). In group B, again, one complete and one partial remission were observed (remission rate 20%). In three cases, stable disease, and in 50% of patients ( n=5), progressive disease, were documented. Median survival was 7.0 months; 1-year survival rate was 20% (2 of 10 patients). If both groups were compared, there was no difference in survival. In addition, no prolongation of survival time was found in comparison with patients of a historical study group treated with established systemic chemotherapy using gemcitabine monotherapy ( n=28; median survival time 9 months). Though a tendency for poorer outcome of i.a. chemotherapy was seen when the Kaplan-Meier curves of survival were compared, this difference was not statistically significant (log rank test, P=0.08). CONCLUSION: Despite conceptual and pharmacokinetic advantages of locoregional i.a. chemotherapy, better outcome with regard to tumour response rate and survival time could not be found. I.a. chemotherapy is, therefore, still an experimental treatment option in pancreatic carcinoma and can, currently, not be recommended for routine use.
机译:背景:局部区域动脉内(i.a.)化疗与全身抗肿瘤药物相比,可在肿瘤内提供高水平的细胞抑制浓度,并同时降低全身性副作用。另外,这可能导致肿瘤反应率增加和生存时间延长。该研究的目的是(1)评估i.a.通过腹腔干细胞注入抑癌药物对肿瘤反应率和生存时间的影响,(2)阐明问题和风险,最后(3)改善胰腺癌的整体治疗管理。病人和方法:在22例局部晚期胰腺癌患者中(12例女性; 10例男性;平均年龄57.1岁),经组织病理学证实,即进行了化疗。通过导管,通过Seldinger技术将其插入股动脉并使其尖端置于腹腔干中,从而提供了两种不同的药物组合。给A组(n = 12)大剂量注射由阿米洛尔(Spherex)和表柔比星(法莫比星)组成的混合物(化学闭塞),然后短时间输注叶酸和24小时输注5-FU。 B组(n = 10)经过5天的治疗:米托蒽醌(Novantrone,第[d]天),5-FU和叶酸(Haemato-folin,第2-4天)和顺铂(第5天)。两组均每4周重复治疗。每8周通过计算机断层摄影术评估肿瘤反应。结果:在A组中,有1例完全缓解和1例缓解,缓解率为16.6%。两名患者表现出稳定的疾病,而三分之二的患者(n = 8)中发现进行性疾病。中位生存时间为3个月; 1年生存率为33.3%(12例患者中的4例)。在B组中,再次观察到完全缓解和部分缓解(缓解率20%)。在三例病例中,病情稳定,在50%的患者中(n = 5),病情进展。中位生存期为7.0个月; 1年生存率为20%(10名患者中的2名)。如果将两组进行比较,生存率没有差异。此外,与使用吉西他滨单药治疗已建立全身化疗的历史研究组患者相比,未发现生存时间延长(n = 28;中位生存时间为9个月)。尽管i.a.的结果趋于较差。比较生存期的Kaplan-Meier曲线可以观察到化疗,这种差异没有统计学意义(对数秩检验,P = 0.08)。结论:尽管局部区域的概念和药代动力学优势。化学疗法,没有发现关于肿瘤反应率和生存时间更好的结果。 I.a.因此,化学疗法仍然是胰腺癌的实验性治疗选择,目前不建议常规使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号