首页> 外文期刊>Caries research >Erosion Remineralization Efficacy of Gel-to-Foam Fluoride Toothpastes in situ: A Randomized Clinical Trial
【24h】

Erosion Remineralization Efficacy of Gel-to-Foam Fluoride Toothpastes in situ: A Randomized Clinical Trial

机译:凝胶-泡沫氟化物牙膏的侵蚀再矿化功效:一项随机临床试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, four-treatment, four-period crossover study compared the enamel remineralization effects of low-and medium-abrasivity gel-to-foam toothpastes and a reference toothpaste (all 1,450 ppm fluoride as NaF) versus placebo toothpaste (0 ppm fluoride) using a short-term in situ erosion model. Subjects (n = 56) wearing a palatal appliance holding acid-softened bovine enamel specimens brushed their teeth with the test toothpastes. Thereafter, the specimens were removed for analysis of percent surface microhardness recovery (%SMHR) and percent relative erosion resistance (%RER) at 2, 4, and 8 h. Both low-and medium-abrasivity gel-to-foam fluoride toothpastes and the reference toothpaste provided significantly greater %SMHR than placebo at all assessment time points (all p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference of % SMHR was observed between the fluoride treatment groups at any time point. Similarly, all fluoride products provided significantly superior %RER versus placebo (all p < 0.0001), whereas no significant difference of this param eter was noted between the fluoride treatment groups. Increasing numerical improvements of %SMHR and %RER were observed in all four treatment groups over time (2, 4, and 8 h). The present in situ model is a sensitive tool to investigate intrinsic and fluoride-enhanced rehardening of eroded enamel. All three fluoride toothpastes were more efficacious than placebo, and there were no safety concerns following single dosing in this short-term in situ model. (C) 2016 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:这项单中心,随机,安慰剂对照,四治疗,四时期的交叉研究比较了中低磨蚀性凝胶至泡沫牙膏和参考牙膏(所有1,450 ppm氟化钠为NaF)的牙釉质再矿化作用与使用短期原位腐蚀模型的安慰剂牙膏(0 ppm氟化物)相比。戴a具的受试者(n = 56)持有酸软化的牛牙釉质标本,用测试牙膏刷牙。此后,取出样品以分析在2、4和8小时的表面显微硬度恢复百分比(%SMHR)和相对耐蚀性百分比(%RER)。在所有评估时间点,低和中度磨蚀性的凝胶发泡泡沫牙膏和参比牙膏提供的%SMHR均显着高于安慰剂(所有p <0.05)。在任何时间点,氟化物治疗组之间均未观察到%SMHR的统计学显着差异。同样,与安慰剂相比,所有氟化物产品均提供了显着优于%RER的%RER(均p <0.0001),而氟化物治疗组之间这一参数没有显着差异。随着时间的推移(2、4和8小时),在所有四个治疗组中观察到的%SMHR和%RER的数值增加都在增加。当前的原位模型是一种敏感的工具,可用于研究腐蚀的釉质的固有和氟化物增强的再硬化。这三种氟化物牙膏均比安慰剂有效,并且在这种短期原位模型中单次给药后没有安全性问题。 (C)2016作者由巴塞尔S. Karger AG发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号