首页> 外文期刊>Landscape and Urban Planning >Evaluating the National Wildlife Federation's Certified Wildlife Habitat (TM) program
【24h】

Evaluating the National Wildlife Federation's Certified Wildlife Habitat (TM) program

机译:评估国家野生动物联盟认证的野生动物栖息地(TM)计划

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The National Wildlife Federation's (NWF) Certified Wildlife Habitat (TM) program strives to provide habitat for wildlife, primarily in human-dominated landscapes. The main objective of our research project was to determine if yards certified in the NWF's program offered wildlife habitat not available in non-certified yards in the same neighborhood. A second objective was to validate the applications of certified landowners by examining habitat listed on their certification application relative to what was available in their yard. Our project focused on neighborhoods within the greater Orlando, Florida metropolitan area. We visited 50 certified yards, 50 neighboring, non-certified yards, and 50 non-adjacent, non-certified yards in the same neighborhood. To evaluate the yards, we used an ecological check-list to determine the quality and quantity of wildlife habitat in each yard. Based on the results of our study, there were significant differences in both quality and quantity of habitat found in certified versus non-certified yards. The Certified Wildlife Habitat (TM) program is successful in that yards in the NWF program offer wildlife habitat that is not available in non-certified yards. However, our biggest recommendation for the NWF program is that it needs to have a larger, more contiguous landscape scope. Certified yards need to be adjacent, or in close enough proximity to one another that they can act as a contiguous landscape in and of themselves, but also have connection to and coordination with other larger blocks of habitat
机译:美国国家野生动物联盟(NWF)认证的野生动物栖息地(TM)计划致力于为野生生物提供栖息地,主要是在人类主导的景观中。我们研究项目的主要目的是确定NWF计划中认证的围场是否提供了同一社区未经认证的围场无法提供的野生生物栖息地。第二个目标是通过检查其认证申请中列出的栖息地(相对于其院子中的可用土地)来验证认证土地所有人的应用。我们的项目专注于佛罗里达州奥兰多大都市圈内的社区。我们访问了同一社区中的50个认证码,50个相邻的非认证码和50个非相邻的非认证码。为了评估围场,我们使用了生态检查表来确定每个围场中野生生物栖息地的质量和数量。根据我们的研究结果,在经过认证的和未经认证的院子中,栖息地的质量和数量均存在显着差异。经过认证的野生动物栖息地(TM)计划取得了成功,因为NWF计划的院子提供了未经认证的院子所没有的野生生物栖息地。但是,我们对NWF计划的最大建议是,它需要具有更大,更连续的景观范围。经过认证的院子必须相邻,或者彼此之间足够接近,这样它们既可以在自身中充当连续的景观,又可以与其他较大的栖息地保持联系并与之协调

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号