...
首页> 外文期刊>Lancet Neurology >Home versus outpatient administration of intravenous steroids for multiple-sclerosis relapses: a randomised controlled trial.
【24h】

Home versus outpatient administration of intravenous steroids for multiple-sclerosis relapses: a randomised controlled trial.

机译:对于多发性硬化症复发,静脉内给予类固醇激素的家庭或门诊患者:一项随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Intravenous steroids are routinely used to treat disabling relapses in multiple sclerosis, and can be administered in an outpatient or home setting. We developed a rating scale that allowed us to compare the two strategies formally in a trial setting. METHODS: Patients who had a clinically significant multiple-sclerosis relapse within 4 weeks of onset were randomly assigned administration of a 3-day regimen of intravenous methylprednisolone either in an outpatient clinic (n=69) or at home (n=69). The MS relapse management scale (MSRMS) was developed to measure patients' experiences of relapse management as the primary outcome. Efficacy of the two treatment modalities was compared in terms of traditional measures and economic cost. A cost-minimisation analysis was also done. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Of 149 eligible patients, 138 consented to participate in the trial and were randomly assigned to a treatment group. Coordination of care was significantly better in the home-treatment group (median score 4.5 [IQR 3.0-11.4]) than in the hospital-treatment group (12.1 [3.0-18.6]; p=0.024). The other dimensions of the MSRMS did not differ between groups (p>0.10). Administration of steroids was equally safe and effective in either location, and cost was either the same or cheaper when delivered at home than when delivered in hospital. INTERPRETATION: Treatment of relapses in multiple sclerosis with intravenous steroids can be effectively and safely administered at home, from both patient and economic perspectives. Moreover, the trial indicates the importance of explicit and valid outcome measures of all aspects of service delivery when making decisions about health policy. This finding has implications for complex service delivery care models for long-term diseases.
机译:背景:静脉内类固醇常规用于治疗多发性硬化症中致残性复发,可在门诊或家庭环境中使用。我们制定了一个评分量表,使我们可以在试用环境中正式比较这两种策略。方法:在发病4周内有临床上明显多发性硬化复发的患者在门诊诊所(n = 69)或在家(n = 69)随机分配为期3天的静脉注射甲基泼尼松龙治疗方案。制定了MS复发管理量表(MSRMS),以测量患者的复发管理经验为主要结果。根据传统措施和经济成本比较了两种治疗方式的疗效。还进行了成本最小化分析。分析是按意向进行的。结果:在149名合格患者中,有138名同意参加该试验,并随机分配到治疗组中。家庭治疗组的护理协调性显着更好(中位数4.5 [IQR 3.0-11.4]),而医院治疗组的护理协调性显着更好(12.1 [3.0-18.6]; p = 0.024)。组间MSRMS的其他维度没有差异(p> 0.10)。在任何一个地点使用类固醇都是安全有效的,在家分娩的费用与在医院分娩的费用相同或便宜。解释:从患者和经济角度看,在家中均可有效,安全地使用静脉类固醇治疗多发性硬化症的复发。此外,该试验表明,在制定有关卫生政策的决策时,必须明确,有效地评估服务提供的各个方面。这一发现对长期疾病的复杂服务提供护理模式具有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号