...
首页> 外文期刊>Lancet Neurology >Apixaban versus aspirin in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack: a predefined subgroup analysis from AVERROES, a randomised trial.
【24h】

Apixaban versus aspirin in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack: a predefined subgroup analysis from AVERROES, a randomised trial.

机译:心房颤动,既往中风或短暂性脑缺血发作的患者使用阿哌沙班和阿司匹林:一项来自AVERROES的预先定义的亚组分析,一项随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the AVERROES study, apixaban, a novel factor Xa inhibitor, reduced the risk of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation who were at high risk of stroke but unsuitable for vitamin K antagonist therapy. We aimed to investigate whether the subgroup of patients with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) would show a greater benefit from apixaban compared with aspirin than would patients without previous cerebrovascular events.In AVERROES, 5599 patients (mean age 70 years) with atrial fibrillation who were at increased risk of stroke and unsuitable for vitamin K antagonist therapy were randomly assigned to receive apixaban (5 mg twice daily) or aspirin (81-324 mg per day). The mean follow-up was 1·1 years. The primary efficacy outcome was stroke or systemic embolism; the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Patients and investigators were masked to study treatment. In this prespecified subgroup analysis, we used Kaplan-Meier estimates of 1-year event risk and Cox proportional hazards regression models to compare the effects of apixaban in patients with and without previous stroke or TIA. AVERROES is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00496769.In patients with previous stroke or TIA, ten events of stroke or systemic embolism occurred in the apixaban group (n=390, cumulative hazard 2·39% per year) compared with 33 in the aspirin group (n=374, 9·16% per year; hazard ratio [HR] 0·29, 95% CI 0·15-0·60). In those without previous stroke or TIA, 41 events occurred in the apixaban group (n=2417, 1·68% per year) compared with 80 in the aspirin group (n=2415, 3·06% per year; HR 0·51, 95% CI 0·35-0·74). The p value for interaction of the effects of aspirin and apixaban with previous cerebrovascular events was 0·17. Major bleeding was more frequent in patients with history of stroke or TIA than in patients without (HR 2·88, 95% CI 1·77-4·55) but risk of this event did not differ between treatment groups.In patients with atrial fibrillation, apixaban is similarly effective whether or not patients have had a previous stroke or TIA. Given that those with previous stroke or TIA have a higher risk of stroke, the absolute benefits might be greater in these patients.Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer.
机译:在AVERROES研究中,一种新型的Xa因子抑制剂apixaban降低了具有高中风风险但不适合使用维生素K拮抗剂治疗的房颤患者中风或全身性栓塞的风险。我们的目的是调查有过中风或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)的患者亚组是否比无阿司匹林的患者从阿司匹林中获益更大,在AVERROES中有5599名患者(平均年龄70岁)卒中风险增加且不适合使用维生素K拮抗剂治疗的颤动被随机分配接受阿哌沙班(每天两次两次,每次5毫克)或阿司匹林(每天一次81-324毫克)。平均随访时间为1·1年。主要疗效结局为中风或全身性栓塞。主要安全结果是大出血。患者和研究者被掩盖以研究治疗方法。在此预先指定的亚组分析中,我们使用了1年事件风险的Kaplan-Meier估计和Cox比例风险回归模型,比较了阿哌沙班对有或无先前卒中或TIA的患者的影响。 AVERROES已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,编号NCT00496769。在先前患有中风或TIA的患者中,阿哌沙班组发生了10次中风或全身性栓塞事件(n = 390,每年累积危害2·39%),而相比之下,阿哌沙班组为33。阿司匹林组(n = 374,每年9·16%;危险比[HR] 0·29,95%CI 0·15-0·60)。在没有先前卒中或TIA的患者中,阿哌沙班组发生41例事件(n = 2417,每年1·68%),而阿司匹林组发生80事件(n = 2415,每年3·06%; HR 0·51) ,95%CI 0·35-0·74)。阿司匹林和阿哌沙班与以前的脑血管事件相互作用的p值是0·17。有卒中或TIA史的患者的大出血发生率比无卒中或TIA的患者大(HR 2·88,95%CI 1·77-4·55),但各治疗组发生这一事件的风险没有差异。无论患者是否曾有过中风或TIA,在心律不齐时,阿哌沙班的疗效均相似。鉴于先前患有中风或TIA的患者中风风险更高,这些患者的绝对获益可能更大.Bristol-Myers Squibb和Pfizer。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号