首页> 外文期刊>Nursing in critical care >Reduction of catheter related bloodstream infections in intensive care: one for all, all for one?
【24h】

Reduction of catheter related bloodstream infections in intensive care: one for all, all for one?

机译:重症监护中与导管相关的血液感染的减少:一人一事,一人一事?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To the Editor: Considering our particular interest in the field of nursing education and infection prevention and control, we would like to shortly respond on the paper of Helder and Latour recently published in the May issue of Nursing in Critical Care (Helder and Latour, 2009). First, the authors describe how the intravascular devices extensively used in the critical care setting negatively contribute in terms of clinical and economic outcome. Second, they discuss some actions to take in an aim to face these 'easy' to avoid problems. In our opinion, and as the authors mention, one of the most crucial strategies includes opportune education demonstrated by the poor knowledge levels found among critical care nurses on different aspects of infection control (Blot et ah, 2007; Labeau et ah, 2008; Vandijck et ah, 2008b; Labeau et ah, 2009). However, and contrary to as commonly perceived, educational initiatives should not only focus on professional nurses already working in nursing practice. More importantly, they should predominantly focus on undergraduate nurse students as we believe this provides a solid basis for their further bedside career.
机译:致编辑:考虑到我们对护理教育以及感染预防和控制领域的特殊兴趣,我们想对最近发表在《重症监护的护理》五月号上的Helder和Latour的论文做出回应(Helder和Latour,2009年) )。首先,作者描述了在重症监护环境中广泛使用的血管内装置如何对临床和经济结果产生负面影响。其次,他们讨论了一些行动,旨在面对这些“轻松”的问题,以避免出现问题。我们认为,正如作者所提到的那样,最关键的策略之一是通过在重症监护护士中对感染控制的不同方面的知识水平不高证明了适当的教育(Blot等,2007; Labeau等,2008; Vandijck等人,2008b; Labeau等人,2009)。但是,与通常认为的相反,教育计划不仅应关注已经从事护理工作的专业护士。更重要的是,他们应主要集中于本科护士学生,因为我们认为这为他们进一步的床边职业打下了坚实的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号