...
首页> 外文期刊>Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases: NMCD >Differences in traditional and emerging cardiovascular risk factors of subjects discordantly classified by metabolic syndrome definitions of the International Diabetes Federation and the National Cholesterol Education Program.
【24h】

Differences in traditional and emerging cardiovascular risk factors of subjects discordantly classified by metabolic syndrome definitions of the International Diabetes Federation and the National Cholesterol Education Program.

机译:国际糖尿病联盟和国家胆固醇教育计划的代谢综合征定义对受试者的传统和新兴心血管危险因素进行了分类。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Several working definitions of metabolic syndrome have been proposed for clinical use. However, individuals can be discordantly classified as having or not having metabolic syndrome depending on the choice of one or another definition. This study compared the cardiovascular risk profile of subjects concordantly and discordantly diagnosed by the criteria of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) and the criteria of the International Diabetes Federation (IDF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Nine hundred and twenty-nine non-diabetic adult subjects belonging to a cross-sectional population-based study in Gran Canaria island (Spain) were assessed. Participants completed a questionnaire and underwent physical examination, fasting blood analyses, and a standardized oral glucose tolerance test. Two hundred and four subjects (22%) had metabolic syndrome according to both definitions, 31 (3.3%) only by the IDF criteria, and 5 (0.5%) only by the NCEP criteria. Participants fulfilling both proposals showed more adverse age and sex-adjusted measures of BMI, waist, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, post-load glucose, HOMA-IR and plasminogen inhibitor activator-1 (PAI-1) than individuals exclusively satisfying the IDF criteria. Moreover, in contrast to subjects meeting both criteria, those that fulfilled only the IDF criteria had levels of BMI, waist, total and HDL cholesterol, post-load glucose, glycated HbA1c, C-reactive protein, PAI-1 and fibrinogen not significantly different from those observed in subjects without metabolic syndrome. CONCLUSION: The IDF definition identifies a surplus of individuals whose cardiovascular risk profile, particularly regarding to some non-traditional cardiovascular risk factors, is less adverse than that observed in subjects also diagnosed by the NCEP definition.
机译:背景与目的:代谢综合征的几种工作定义已被提出用于临床。然而,根据对一个或另一种定义的选择,可以将个体不合时宜地分类为患有代谢综合症。这项研究比较了根据国家胆固醇教育计划(NCEP)和国际糖尿病联合会(IDF)的标准一致诊断和不一致诊断的受试者的心血管风险。方法和结果:对在大加那利岛(西班牙)进行的基于人群的横断面研究的929名非糖尿病成人受试者进行了评估。参加者完成了一份问卷,并接受了身体检查,空腹血液分析和标准化的口服葡萄糖耐量测试。根据这两种定义,有204名受试者(22%)患有代谢综合征,仅IDF标准为31名(3.3%),NCEP标准仅5名(0.5%)。满足这两个建议的参与者显示出比仅满足IDF标准的个体更多的不利年龄和性别校正的BMI,腰部,HDL胆固醇,甘油三酸酯,负荷后葡萄糖,HOMA-IR和纤溶酶原抑制剂激活剂1(PAI-1)。此外,与同时符合两项标准的受试者相比,仅符合IDF标准的受试者的BMI,腰围,总胆固醇和HDL胆固醇,负荷后葡萄糖,糖化HbA1c,C反应蛋白,PAI-1和纤维蛋白原水平没有显着差异从没有代谢综合征的受试者中观察到的那些。结论:IDF定义确定了一些多余的个体,其心血管风险特征,尤其是与某些非传统的心血管风险因素有关,比在同样通过NCEP定义诊断的受试者中观察到的不利程度要小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号