...
首页> 外文期刊>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: Official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions >Directional atherectomy prior to stenting in bifurcation lesions: a matched comparison study with stenting alone.
【24h】

Directional atherectomy prior to stenting in bifurcation lesions: a matched comparison study with stenting alone.

机译:分叉病变中支架置入术前的定向旋切术:一项单独支架置入术的匹配比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The ideal catheter-based intervention for treatment of coronary lesions at bifurcation site still has to be defined. The aim of the study was to assess the acute and long-term outcome after treatment of bifurcation lesions with directional atherectomy (DCA) and stenting in comparison with stenting alone. Thirty-one consecutive patients treated for bifurcation coronary lesions (62 lesions) with DCA and stenting in at least one branch (DCA group) were compared with a matched group of 31 patients with bifurcation coronary lesions (62 lesions) treated with stenting alone in at least one branch (non-DCA group). Procedural success was 87.1% in the DCA group compared with 100% in the non-DCA group (P = 0.03). In-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) occurred only in the DCA group (12.9% vs. 0%, P = 0.03), mainly non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. After the procedure, minimum lumen diameter (MLD) and acute gain were significantly greater (P = 0.004 and P = 0.05, respectively) and % diameter stenosis was significantly lower (P = 0.05) in the main branch in the DCA group. At follow-up angiogram, MLD in the main branch was still significantly greater in the DCA group compared to the non-DCA group (2.31 vs. 1.65, respectively, P = 0.04), with no significant difference in late loss and loss index between the two groups. Restenosis rate was 28.8% in the DCA group vs. 43.5% in the non-DCA group (P = 0.13). The incidence of follow-up MACE was 29% in the DCA group compared with 48.4% in the non-DCA group, mainly due to target lesion revascularization. In conclusion, treatment of bifurcation coronary lesions with DCA and stenting was associated with greater acute gain after the procedure and greater MLD at follow-up in the main branch compared with stenting alone. Procedural myocardial infarction was more frequent in the DCA group. Restenosis rates and follow-up MACE were lower following DCA and stenting, without reaching any statistical significance. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
机译:基于导管的理想介入治疗分叉部位的冠状动脉病变仍需定义。这项研究的目的是评估与单独支架置入术相比,定向旋切术(DCA)和支架置入术治疗分叉病变后的急性和长期预后。将在至少一个分支(DCA组)中用DCA和支架置入术治疗的31例分叉型冠状动脉病变(62个病灶)的连续患者与在单独的支架内用支架治疗的31例分叉型冠状动脉病变(62个病灶)的配对组进行比较。至少一个分支(非DCA组)。 DCA组手术成功率为87.1%,而非DCA组为100%(P = 0.03)。仅在DCA组中发生院内重大不良心脏事件(MACE)(12.9%vs. 0%,P = 0.03),主要是非Q波心肌梗塞。手术后,DCA组的主要分支的最小管腔直径(MLD)和急性增高明显更大(分别为P = 0.004和P = 0.05),狭窄百分比%明显更低(P = 0.05)。随访血管造影时,DCA组的主要分支中的MLD仍显着高于非DCA组(分别为2.31和1.65,P = 0.04),晚期丢失和丢失指数之间无显着差异。两组。 DCA组的再狭窄率为28.8%,而非DCA组为43.5%(P = 0.13)。 DCA组的随访MACE发生率为29%,而非DCA组为48.4%,这主要是由于靶病变血运重建所致。总之,与单独使用支架置入术相比,采用DCA和支架置入术治疗分叉型冠状动脉病变与手术后急性增高和主要分支随访时的MLD更大有关。在DCA组中,程序性心肌梗塞更为常见。 DCA和置入支架后,再狭窄率和后续MACE降低,但无统计学意义。版权所有2001 Wiley-Liss,Inc.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号