...
首页> 外文期刊>Nutrition Reviews >When is an individual an individual versus a member of a group? An issue in the application of the dietary reference intakes
【24h】

When is an individual an individual versus a member of a group? An issue in the application of the dietary reference intakes

机译:什么时候个人是个人还是团体成员?膳食参考摄入量应用中的一个问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) reports on Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) present a new paradigm for the description of nutrient requirements. Tradition and the DRI reports themselves have created an erroneous impression that the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) is intended for use with individuals and the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) is to be used with populations. Two recent IOM committee reports (one on nutrition labeling and one on Women, Infants and Children [WIC] food packages) challenge that interpretation, revealing the critical issues surrounding individuals versus groups or populations. The present paper examines the issues and concludes that the median requirement and Tolerable Upper Limit (UL) are the critical reference values for both individuals and populations. The RDA is both unneeded and lacking a sound scientific basis.
机译:医学研究所(IOM)关于膳食参考摄入量(DRI)的报告提出了一种描述营养需求的新范例。传统和DRI报告本身已经产生了错误的印象,即建议膳食津贴(RDA)供个人使用,而估计平均需求(EAR)供人群使用。国际移民组织委员会最近的两份报告(一份关于营养标签,一份关于妇女,婴儿和儿童[WIC]食品包装)对这一解释提出了挑战,揭示了围绕个人,群体或人群的关键问题。本文研究了这些问题,并得出结论:中位数要求和可忍受的上限是个人和人群的关键参考值。 RDA既不需要,又缺乏可靠的科学依据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号