首页> 外文期刊>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: Official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions >Clinical and technical determinants of the complexity of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty procedures: analysis in relation to radiation exposure parameters.
【24h】

Clinical and technical determinants of the complexity of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty procedures: analysis in relation to radiation exposure parameters.

机译:经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术的复杂性的临床和技术决定因素:与辐射暴露参数有关的分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Few data are available on the quantitative assessment of complexity (C), especially in relation to a patient's exposure to radiation. The relationship between several clinical (CFs), anatomic (AFs), and technical factors (TFs) versus fluoroscopy time (FT) was evaluated in 402 random percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) procedures. CFs were age, sex, single or multivessel disease, ejection fraction, and previous coronary artery bypass graft. AFs were assessed based on the American Heart Association / American College of Cardiology classification. TFs were multivessel PTCA, use of the double wire or double balloon technique, stenting, ostial stenting, bifurcation stenting, and intravascular ultrasonography. No CFs significantly influenced FT, whereas all AFs and TFs (except multivessel PTCA) did significantly influence FT. A scoring system was developed, and two complexity indexes (CI) were conceived, based on which the procedures were divided into three groups: simple, medium, and complex. The mean FTs were 471+/-289, 805+/-532, and 1,190+/-641 (P <0.0001), respectively. Total cine frame recordings were 1,119+/-572, 1,265+/-644 (P = 0.0355), and 1,418+/-785 (P<0.0001 vs. simple; P = NS vs. medium). The dose/area product measurement was 65.8+/-41.4, 93 +/-58.5 (P<0.0001), and 116.7+/-72.8 (P<0.0001 vs. simple; P = 0.00159 vs. medium), respectively. In our series, CI was directly related to AF and TF, but not to CF. Comparison of PTCA procedures and definition of appropriate FT should consider CIs.
机译:关于复杂性(C)定量评估的数据很少,尤其是与患者的放射线暴露有关的数据。在402个随机经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术(PTCA)程序中评估了几种临床(CF),解剖(AF)和技术因素(TF)与透视时间(FT)之间的关系。 CFs是年龄,性别,单支或多支血管疾病,射血分数和先前的冠状动脉搭桥术。根据美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会分类评估房颤。 TFs是多支血管PTCA,使用双线或双气囊技术,支架,骨支架,分叉支架和血管内超声检查。没有CF显着影响FT,而所有AF和TF(多支PTCA除外)均显着影响FT。开发了一种计分系统,并构想了两个复杂度指标(CI),将其分为三个组:简单,中级和复杂。平均FT分别为471 +/- 289、805 +/- 532和1,190 +/- 641(P <0.0001)。电影的总帧记录为1,119 +/- 572、1,265 +/- 644(P = 0.0355)和1,418 +/- 785(P <0.0001 vs.简单; P = NS vs.中等)。剂量/面积乘积测量分别为65.8 +/- 41.4、93 +/- 58.5(P <0.0001)和116.7 +/- 72.8(P <0.0001对简单; P = 0.00159对中等)。在我们的系列文章中,CI与AF和TF直接相关,但与CF不相关。比较PTCA程序和定义适当的FT应该考虑CI。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号