首页> 外文期刊>Nursing research >Measuring restorative care provided by nursing assistants: reliability and validity of the Restorative Care Behavior Checklist.
【24h】

Measuring restorative care provided by nursing assistants: reliability and validity of the Restorative Care Behavior Checklist.

机译:衡量护理助理提供的恢复性护理:“恢复性护理行为清单”的可靠性和有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Most prior research on the outcomes of restorative care programs has been focused on resident outcomes including such things as functional performance, behavior, and quality of life. Treatment fidelity issues and compliance with the programs were not addressed in these studies. Without such an evaluation, it is impossible to evaluate the effectiveness of restorative care activities. PURPOSE: To test the reliability and validity of the Restorative Care Behavior Checklist (RCBC), which is an observed measure of restorative care activities performed by nursing assistants (NAs). METHODS: The study involved a single observation of care activities and completion of survey data among NAs working in nursing homes. A total of 386 participants from eight nursing homes were included in the study. In addition to completion of the RCBC during a 15-minute observation of care activities, demographic data were obtained, and participants completed a paper-and-pencil survey that included assessments of self-efficacy, outcome expectations, knowledge of restorative care, and job attitude. Reliability testing was based on person separation reliability and interrater reliability. Validity testing was based on evidence of the unidimensionality of the measure, the fit of the items using Rasch analysis, and evidence of convergent validity. RESULTS: There was support for the reliability of the RCBC with a person separation reliability of .77 and interrater reliability, with 83% to 100% agreement on each of the care activities. Support for validity was provided based on evidence of unidimensionality and a good fit of the items. There was minimal support for convergent validity. DISCUSSION: The development and psychometric testing of the RCBC are an important first step in the observational assessment of restorative care activities performed by NAs, or other caregivers of older adults, living in long-term care settings.
机译:背景:关于恢复性护理计划结果的大多数先前研究都集中在居民的结果上,包括功能表现,行为和生活质量。这些研究未解决治疗保真度问题和对程序的依从性。没有这样的评估,就不可能评估恢复性护理活动的有效性。目的:测试恢复护理行为清单(RCBC)的可靠性和有效性,该清单是护理助理(NAs)进行的恢复护理活动的一项观察指标。方法:该研究涉及在护理院工作的NA中对护理活动的单一观察和调查数据的完成。该研究包括来自八个疗养院的386名参与者。除了在15分钟的护理活动观察期间完成RCBC之外,还获得了人口统计数据,并且参与者还完成了纸笔调查,其中包括自我效能评估,结果期望,恢复性护理知识和工作态度。可靠性测试基于人员分离的可靠性和人际间的可靠性。有效性测试基于度量的一维性证据,使用Rasch分析的项目适合性以及收敛有效性的证据。结果:RCBC的可靠性得到支持,人身分离的可靠性为0.77,而人与人之间的可靠性为每项护理活动的83%至100%一致。基于一维性和项目的合适性的证据,为有效性提供了支持。对收敛有效性的支持很少。讨论:RCBC的开发和心理测试是对居住在长期护理场所中的NAs或其他老年人的恢复性护理活动进行观察性评估的重要的第一步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号