首页> 外文期刊>New Zealand Journal of Ecology >Introduced blackbirds and song thrushes: useful substitutes for lost mid-sized native frugivores, or weed vectors?
【24h】

Introduced blackbirds and song thrushes: useful substitutes for lost mid-sized native frugivores, or weed vectors?

机译:引入了黑鸟和鹅口疮:有用的替代品,可以替代丢失的中型天然食草动物或杂草媒介?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The New Zealand avifauna has declined from human impacts, which might leave some larger-seeded native plants vulnerable to dispersal failure. We studied fruit dispersal in a lowland secondary forest near Kaikoura, where the only remaining native frugivores are relatively small (silvereye Zosterops lateralis, and bellbird Anthornis melanura). We tested whether two larger exotic frugivores (blackbird Turdus merula and song thrush T. philomelos) dispersed native plants with seeds too large for the two smaller native frugivores. Diet breadth was measured by identifying seeds in the faeces of 221 mist-netted birds, and by observations of birds foraging. We then compared the plant species dispersed to the range of locally available fruits. All four bird species had varied diets (6-9 plant species per bird species) that differed significantly, although Coprosma robusta was always the most-eaten fruit. As predicted, the maximum fruit size eaten was larger for exotic birds (11.3 mm diameter) than natives (7.4-7.7 mm diameter), but all birds ate mainly smaller fruits. However, 7/21 fruiting plant species were not seen to be dispersed by any species, and the chance of being undispersed was independent of fruit size. Blackbirds and song thrushes jointly dispersed all four woody weeds with fruits >7.5 mm diameter, but neither of the two similar-sized native plants. Although the two species of exotic birds dispersed some native plants, our study suggests that their net effect is negative through facilitating the spread of invasive weeds. Studies evaluating the contribution of exotic frugivores to novel plant communities need to distinguish potential effects (what the frugivores might be capable of doing) from actual effects (what the frugivores are observed doing).
机译:新西兰的鸟类已经摆脱了人类的影响,这可能会使一些较大种子的本土植物容易遭受传播失败的影响。我们研究了在Kaikoura附近的低地次生森林中的水果散布情况,那里仅有的剩余本地食肉动物相对较小(银眼Zosteropslateralis和铃鸟Anthornis melanura)。我们测试了两个较大的外来食肉动物(黑鸟Turdus merula和鹅口疮鸣鸟T. philomelos)是否分散了种子中对于两个较小的外来食肉动物而言过大的本地植物。通过确定221只薄雾网状鸟粪便中的种子并观察鸟类觅食来测量日粮宽度。然后,我们将分散的植物种类与本地可用果实的种类进行了比较。四种鸟类的饮食结构各不相同(每种鸟类6-9种植物),尽管罗布斯塔合作pro始终是最常吃的水果,但它们的饮食差异却很大。正如预测的那样,外来鸟类(直径11.3毫米)所吃的最大水果大小比本地人(直径7.4-7.7毫米)要大,但是所有鸟类主要吃较小的水果。但是,没有看到7/21的结果实植物物种被任何物种分散,未分散的机会与果实大小无关。黑鸟和鹅口疮共同驱散了直径大于7.5 mm的果实的全部四种木本杂草,但两种相似大小的本地植物均未散播。尽管这两种外来鸟类物种分散了一些本土植物,但我们的研究表明,它们的净效应是通过促进入侵性杂草的扩散而产生的负面影响。评估外来果蝇对新型植物群落的贡献的研究需要区分潜在效应(果蝇可能会做什么)和实际效应(观察到果蝇会做什么)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号