首页> 外文期刊>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: Official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions >Enhanced stent imaging improves the diagnosis of stent underexpansion and optimizes stent deployment
【24h】

Enhanced stent imaging improves the diagnosis of stent underexpansion and optimizes stent deployment

机译:增强的支架成像可改善对支架扩张不足的诊断并优化支架的部署

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives To investigate the clinical value and diagnostic accuracy of enhanced stent imaging (ESI) as compared with quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Background ESI is an image acquisition and processing angiography-based software that improves visualization and provides measurements of deployed stents. Methods A total of 40 consecutive patients (42 stents) were studied. Stent deployment was evaluated sequentially and independently by angiography, ESI, and IVUS. Following each imaging modality, the operator determined the necessity of postdilation unrelated to the other modalities. Stent diameters were measured off-line by QCA, ESI, and IVUS at several sites along the deployed stent and compared. Results Following stent deployment and based solely on angiography, the operator decided to postdilate seven of the 42 stents (16.7%). This decision was not changed after reviewing the ESI images of these seven stents. Of the 35 stents not requiring postdilation based on angiography alone, ESI influenced the operator to change the decision and postdilate 10 of 35 stents (28.6%). The ESI-based measurements had better correlation with IVUS (r = 0.721, P < 0.0001) than did QCA with IVUS (r = 0.563, P < 0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis showed a trend towards better agreement between ESI and IVUS than between QCA and IVUS (mean differences = 0.038 vs. 0.121; P = 0.19, respectively). Conclusions ESI is an easy to use modality that enhances stent visualization, helps in the decision making process whether to postdilate the stent, and provides estimation of stent expansion with better correlations than QCA when compared to IVUS. ? 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
机译:目的探讨与定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)和血管内超声(IVUS)相比,增强支架成像(ESI)的临床价值和诊断准确性。背景ESI是基于图像采集和处理血管造影的软件,可改善可视化并提供已部署支架的测量结果。方法对40例连续患者(42个支架)进行研究。依次通过血管造影,ESI和IVUS独立评估支架的部署情况。在每种成像方式之后,操作员确定了与其他方式无关的后扩张的必要性。支架直径通过QCA,ESI和IVUS在展开的支架上几个位置离线测量并进行比较。结果在部署完支架之后,仅根据血管造影,操作者决定将42个支架中的7个支架扩张(16.7%)。在检查了这七个支架的ESI图像后,该决定没有改变。在35个不需要单独基于血管造影进行后扩张的支架中,ESI影响操作者更改决定并在35个支架中的10个支架中进行扩张(28.6%)。基于ESI的测量与IVUS的相关性更好(r = 0.721,P <0.0001),而具有IVUS的QCA具有更好的相关性(r = 0.563,P <0.0001)。 Bland-Altman分析显示,ESI和IVUS之间的一致性比QCA和IVUS之间的一致性更高(平均差异分别为0.038和0.121; P = 0.19)。结论ESI是一种易于使用的方式,可增强支架的可视性,有助于在决策过程中是否对支架进行后扩张,并且与IVUS相比,可提供比QCA更好的相关性来评估支架扩展。 ? 2012 Wiley期刊公司

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号