...
首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Medicine Communications >18F-FDG PET, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, and CT in metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma: a clinical study and an analysis of the literature.
【24h】

18F-FDG PET, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, and CT in metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma: a clinical study and an analysis of the literature.

机译:18F-FDG PET,生长抑素受体闪烁体显像和CT在甲状腺髓样转移癌中的临床研究和文献分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIM: To determine the clinical potential of 2-[F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (F-FDG PET) in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), we compared it to computed tomography (CT), and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Blinded evaluation of PET, CT and SRS images obtained from 26 patients with histologically proven metastatic MTC was done by nuclear medicine and radiology specialists. Sites of tumour involvement were classified as sure different standards. Either those sites classified as "sure" by at least one of the methods were defined as the standard or those sites of involvement which were classified as "sure" by at least two methods. RESULTS: Dependent on the type of data analysis performed, PET was able to demonstrate 56.8%/80.6% of the tumour sites, CT showed 64.5%/79.6%, and SRS showed 47.5%/69.9% of the tumour sites. CONCLUSION: Overall, CT is similar or better than PET in our patients (dependent on the standard) while SRS is inferior to both other techniques. Our data are in agreement with publications that consider CT superior to PET in the diagnosis of metastatic MTC while other studies show superiority of PET. However, a combination of CT and PET seems to be the most appropriate non-invasive diagnostic approach in patients with MTC.
机译:目的:为了确定甲状腺髓样癌(MTC)患者2- [F]氟-2-脱氧-D-葡萄糖-葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(F-FDG PET)的临床潜力,我们将其与计算机断层扫描(CT)进行了比较,以及生长抑素受体闪烁显像(SRS)。患者和方法:由核医学和放射学专家对从26例经组织学证实为转移性MTC的患者获得的PET,CT和SRS图像进行盲法评估。肿瘤受累部位被确定为不同的标准。通过至少一种方法将那些被分类为“确定”的位点定义为标准,或者将通过至少两种方法被划分为“确定”的那些位点定义为标准。结果:根据所进行的数据分析的类型,PET可以显示56.8%/ 80.6%的肿瘤部位,CT可以显示64.5%/ 79.6%,SRS可以显示47.5%/ 69.9%的肿瘤部位。结论:总体而言,在我们的患者中,CT与PET相似或更好(取决于标准),而SRS不如其他两种技术。我们的数据与认为CT在转移性MTC诊断方面优于PET的出版物相符,而其他研究则显示PET的优势。但是,CT和PET的结合似乎是MTC患者最合适的非侵入性诊断方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号