...
首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Medicine Communications >Development of a modified sampling and calculation method for isotope plasma clearance assessment of the glomerular filtration rate in patients with cirrhosis and ascites
【24h】

Development of a modified sampling and calculation method for isotope plasma clearance assessment of the glomerular filtration rate in patients with cirrhosis and ascites

机译:改进的用于肝硬化和腹水患者的血浆血浆清除率评估肾小球滤过率的采样和计算方法的开发

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

I read with much interest the paper published by Wickham et al. [1]. Indeed, an accurate radionuclide method for measuring renal clearance in patients with ascites is still missing.However, the design of the study is surprising. As mentioned by the guidelines, the only accepted method in this type of patients is the comparison between urine and plasma samples, because one avoids the problems of additional spaces of distribution. The authors claim that this method is inaccurate, although many others such as Brochner-Mortensen J., Chantler C, Klassen D.K., and Otto A.G. have used this method as the reference for testing simplified methods. However, I do not deny the technical difficulties related to the method, such as the need for multiple long periods of urine collection. The authors, having eliminated the urine method, consider in their introduction that 'there is no widely agreed mathematical model of plasma clearance in the presence of ascites and oedema'.
机译:我非常感兴趣地阅读了Wickham等人发表的论文。 [1]。确实,仍然缺乏用于测量腹水患者肾脏清除率的准确放射性核素方法,但是这项研究的设计令人惊讶。如指南所述,在这种类型的患者中,唯一可以接受的方法是尿液和血浆样品之间的比较,因为这避免了额外的分配空间的问题。作者声称这种方法是不准确的,尽管诸如Brochner-Mortensen J.,Chantler C,Klassen D.K.和Otto A.G.等许多其他人已将该方法用作测试简化方法的参考。但是,我不否认与该方法有关的技术难题,例如需要多次长时间收集尿液。作者在取消了尿液检查方法后,在引言中认为“在存在腹水和水肿的情况下,血浆清除率没有公认的数学模型”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号