...
首页> 外文期刊>Nutrition >Total parenteral nutrition delays platelet engraftment in patients who undergo autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
【24h】

Total parenteral nutrition delays platelet engraftment in patients who undergo autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

机译:全肠外营养会延迟接受自体造血干细胞移植的患者的血小板植入。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVES:One of the major challenges in the post-transplant period is nutrition. In this prospective, non-randomized study, total parenteral nutrition (TPN) was given to 31 patients and partial parenteral nutrition (PPN) was given to 30 patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for solid tumors or hematologic malignancies to compare the effects of these parenteral nutrition modalities on post-transplant hematological engraftment, blood chemistry, and supportive therapy requirements.METHODS:All patients in the TPN group and 17 patients in the PPN group received growth factor in the post-transplant period. Both groups did not differ with respect to sex, age, and reinfused CD34(+) cell numbers.RESULTS:After transplantation body mass index and body weight decreased significantly in both groups (P < 0.001). Whereas serum albumin concentrations did not decrease significantly in the TPN group, it fell markedly in the PPN group at the end of parenteral nutrition (P = 0.019). After parenteral nutrition, blood chemistry was also remarkable for serum urea and glucose levels, which were elevated significantly in the TPN group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.03, respectively). Patients receiving TPN had a higher incidence of positive microbial cultures and clinical infection than did patients receiving PPN (64.5% versus 40%, P = 0.05). The most striking result was a delay in platelet engraftment for the TPN group compared with the PPN group (15.54 and 12.93 d, respectively; P = 0.014). This difference was also noted in patients using growth factor in the PPN group (P = 0.017). Parallel to these results, platelet transfusion requirement increased in the TPN group compared with the PPN group (1.93 versus 1.16 U, P = 0.004). Both groups were unremarkable for leukocyte recovery and red blood cell transfusion requirement.CONCLUSIONS:Consequently, TPN has some pitfalls of hyperglycemia, infection tendency, delayed platelet engraftment, and increased platelet transfusion requirement. Therefore, it should not be used as a standard nutrition support for patients undergoing autotransplantation.
机译:目的:营养是移植后阶段的主要挑战之一。在这项前瞻性,非随机性研究中,对31例患者进行了全肠外营养(TPN),对30例因实体瘤或血液系统恶性肿瘤进行自体造血干细胞移植的患者进行了部分肠胃外营养(PPN),以比较这些方法的效果方法:TPN组的所有患者和PPN组的17名患者在移植后均接受了生长因子治疗。两组在性别,年龄和再注入的CD34(+)细胞数量方面均无差异。结果:移植后两组的体重指数和体重均显着降低(P <0.001)。在肠外营养结束时,TPN组的血清白蛋白浓度没有显着下降,而PPN组的血清白蛋白浓度却显着下降(P = 0.019)。肠胃外营养后,血液化学中血清尿素和葡萄糖水平也很显着,TPN组显着升高(分别为P <0.001和P = 0.03)。与接受PPN的患者相比,接受TPN的患者发生阳性微生物培养物和临床感染的发生率更高(64.5%对40%,P = 0.05)。与PPN组相比,TPN组的血小板移植延迟最明显(分别为15.54和12.93 d; P = 0.014)。在PPN组中使用生长因子的患者中也注意到了这种差异(P = 0.017)。与这些结果平行的是,与PPN组相比,TPN组的血小板输注需求增加(1.93对1.16 U,P = 0.004)。结论:TPN具有高血糖,感染倾向,血小板移植延迟和血小板输注需求增加的陷阱。因此,不应将其用作自体移植患者的标准营养支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号