...
首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Medicine and Biology >Clinical correlative evaluation of an iterative method for reconstruction of brain SPECT images.
【24h】

Clinical correlative evaluation of an iterative method for reconstruction of brain SPECT images.

机译:临床相关评估的一种迭代方法,用于重建脑SPECT图像。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Brain SPECT and PET investigations have showed discrepancies in Alzheimer's disease (AD) when considering data deriving from deeply located structures, such as the mesial temporal lobe. These discrepancies could be due to a variety of factors, including substantial differences in gamma-cameras and underlying technology. Mesial temporal structures are deeply located within the brain and the commonly used Filtered Back-Projection (FBP) technique does not fully take into account either the physical parameters of gamma-cameras or geometry of collimators. In order to overcome these limitations, alternative reconstruction methods have been proposed, such as the iterative method of the Conjugate Gradients with modified matrix (CG). However, the clinical applications of these methods have so far been only anecdotal. The present study was planned to compare perfusional SPECT data as derived from the conventional FBP method and from the iterative CG method, which takes into account the geometrical and physical characteristics of the gamma-camera, by a correlative approach with neuropsychology.Methods: Correlations were compared between perfusion of the hippocampal region, as achieved by both the FBP and the CG reconstruction methods, and a short-memory test (Selective Reminding Test, SRT), specifically addressing one of its function. A brain-dedicated camera (CERASPECT) was used for SPECT studies with 99mTc-hexamethylpropylene-amine-oxime in 23 consecutive patients (mean age: 74.2 +/- 6.5) with mild (Mini-Mental Status Examination score >/=15, mean 20.3 +/- 3), probable AD. Counts from a hippocampal region in each hemisphere were referred to the average thalamic counts.Results: Hippocampal perfusion significantly correlated with the MMSE score with similar statistical significance (p < 0.01) between the two reconstruction methods. Correlation between hippocampal perfusion and the SRT score was better with the CG method (r = 0.50 for both hemispheres, p < 0.01) than with the FBP method (r = 0.37 and 0.43, respectively for the right and left hemisphere, p < 0.05 and p < 0.02). The bootstrap procedure showed that such correlation indexes were statistically different both in the right (p < 0.01) and in the left (p < 0.05) hemisphere.Conclusion: These results are interpreted as a better performance of the CG reconstruction method in correctly detecting counts from hippocampal ROI. By using the same gamma-camera or collimator, alternative methods for brain SPECT reconstruction may improve quality of data and then help SPECT diagnostic accuracy.
机译:背景:脑部SPECT和PET研究显示,当考虑来自深处结构(例如颞中叶)的数据时,阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)存在差异。这些差异可能是由多种因素引起的,包括伽马相机和基础技术的实质差异。颞中部结构深深地位于大脑内部,常用的过滤反投影(FBP)技术并未完全考虑到伽马相机的物理参数或准直仪的几何形状。为了克服这些限制,已经提出了替代的重建方法,例如具有改进矩阵的共轭梯度(CG)的迭代方法。但是,到目前为止,这些方法的临床应用只是传闻。本研究计划通过与神经心理学的相关方法,比较从常规FBP方法和迭代CG方法获得的灌注SPECT数据,该方法考虑了伽玛相机的几何和物理特征。比较了通过FBP和CG重建方法实现的海马区灌注与短时记忆测试(选择性提醒测试,SRT)之间的区别,该测试专门针对其功能之一。使用脑专用相机(CERASPECT)对99例Tc-六甲基丙烯胺-肟进行SPECT研究,对23例轻度(最小精神状态检查分数> / = 15,均值)的患者(平均年龄:74.2 +/- 6.5) 20.3 +/- 3),可能是AD。结果:两个重建方法之间,海马灌注与MMSE评分显着相关(p <0.01),与每个半球海马区的计数相称。 CG法(两个半球的r = 0.50,p <0.01)比FBP法(右半球和左半球的r = 0.37和0.43,分别为p <0.05和0.43)更好,海马灌注与SRT评分之间的相关性更好。 p <0.02)。引导程序表明,右半球(p <0.01)和左半球(p <0.05)的相关指数在统计学上是不同的。来自海马的ROI。通过使用相同的伽马相机或准直仪,用于大脑SPECT重建的替代方法可以提高数据质量,进而帮助SPECT诊断准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号