首页> 外文期刊>Nurse education today >'Tech' versus 'Talk': A comparison study of two different lecture styles within a Master of Science nurse practitioner course
【24h】

'Tech' versus 'Talk': A comparison study of two different lecture styles within a Master of Science nurse practitioner course

机译:“技术”与“对话”:理科硕士执业医师课程中两种不同演讲风格的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Generation Y students have a strong preference for technology that has caused educators to re-evaluate their instructional techniques. Limited published literature exists evaluating the benefits of electronic lecture delivery to students enrolled within nursing degree programs, with no publications to date comparing traditional to blended learning modalities. Objectives: To retrospectively compare student outcomes, including overall course grade and individual examination scores, between two cohorts of students utilizing two distinctly different methods of lecture delivery, traditional and blended. Methods: IRB approval was granted to retrospectively compare student outcomes from fifty-two students enrolled within Northeastern University's Master of Science Nurse Practitioner degree program. A total of 23 students were enrolled in the traditional section taught in 2010 and 29 students were enrolled in the blended section taught in 2011. Student's. t-test was used to compare studied outcomes between each section. A p-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: The students enrolled within blended course scored statistically significantly higher than their counterparts within the traditional course for three of the four studied outcomes, including overall course score. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that nursing students enrolled within a more technologically advanced course may have improved performance over students enrolled in courses with traditional lecture styles given their generational preferences for learning.
机译:背景:Y世代学生对技术产生了强烈的偏好,这种技术已导致教育者重新评估他们的教学技术。有限的出版文献评估了电子授课对护理学位课程中的学生的好处,迄今尚无出版物将传统学习方式与混合学习方式进行比较。目的:使用两种截然不同的传统授课和混合授课方法,回顾性比较两组学生之间的学习成果,包括总体课程成绩和个人考试成绩。方法:授予IRB批准,以回顾性比较东北大学理学硕士护理从业者学位课程的52名学生的学习成果。共有23名学生报名参加了2010年传统课的授课,有29名学生报名参加了2011年授课的混合课。 t检验用于比较各部分之间的研究结果。 ≤0.05的p值被认为具有统计学意义。结果:在包括整体课程得分在内的四个研究成果中,有三个课程的学生在混合课程中的得分在统计学上显着高于传统课程中的学生。结论:这项研究表明,考虑到一代人的学习偏好,就读于技术水平更高的课程的护理学生可能会比采用传统演讲风格的课程的学生表现更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号