首页> 外文期刊>journal of clinical and diagnostic research >A Prospective, Double-blinded, Crossover Study to Determine the Equivalence of the Serum Levels and the Peak Level Toxicity of Diphenylhydantoin (EptoinR)
【24h】

A Prospective, Double-blinded, Crossover Study to Determine the Equivalence of the Serum Levels and the Peak Level Toxicity of Diphenylhydantoin (EptoinR)

机译:一项前瞻性、双盲、交叉研究,以确定二苯乙内酰脲 (EptoinR) 血清水平和峰值毒性的等效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Context: In India, phenytoin is often prescribed as twice daily or thrice daily dosage schedules. In the West, this practice has been changed to a once daily regimen in most of the cases. Can we in India follow suit? Is our physical and genetic make up with regards to the phenytoin pharmacokinetics different? Does this necessitate a multiple dosing regimen to avoid adverse effects or even breakthrough seizures? Aims: This study was aimed at comparing 300mg once daily of phenytoin and 100mg tid of phenytoin in terms of its adverse effects, peak and trough serum concentrations. Settings and Design: Out patients attending the Neurology Department, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India. This was a prospective, randomized, double blinded, crossover study. Methods and Materials: Twenty-four patients were enrolled into the study. An informed consent was taken from them. Their liver and renal functions were checked. Their basal phenytoin levels were also estimated. Once the preliminary tests were found to be normal, the patients were inducted randomly into one of the two treatment arms, either 300mg once daily or 100mg thrice daily. Each arm was given for a 2 week period. Adverse effects were looked for and the peak and trough phenytoin concentrations were estimated. Statistical Analysis Used: The mean, SD and the P values were obtained by the Per Protocol and the ITT (Intention to Treat) analysis of the trough and peak serum levels by using Wilcoxon’s signed rank test. Results: One patient experienced an adverse effect in the once daily regimen as compared to no adverse effects in the tid regimen. The adverse effect was not consequential to the patient. Statistically, the trough concentrations were not significantly different between the regimens, although the peak concentrations of the once daily regimen were significantly higher. Conclusions: In conclusion, it can be said that the once daily regimen can be prescribed for Indian patients with epilepsy.
机译:背景:在印度,苯妥英通常被规定为每天两次或每天三次的剂量方案。在西方,在大多数情况下,这种做法已改为每天一次。我们印度能效仿吗?我们对苯妥英钠药代动力学的物理和基因构成是否不同?这是否需要多次给药方案以避免不良反应甚至突破性癫痫发作?目的:本研究旨在比较 300mg 每日一次的苯妥英钠和 100mg tid 苯妥英钠的不良反应、血清峰值和谷值浓度。设置和设计:印度韦洛尔基督教医学院神经内科就诊的门诊患者。这是一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、交叉研究。方法和材料:24 名患者被纳入研究。从他们那里获得了知情同意。检查了他们的肝肾功能。还估计了他们的基础苯妥英水平。一旦初步测试发现正常,患者被随机引入两个治疗组之一,每天一次 300 毫克或每天三次 100 毫克。每只手臂接受为期 2 周的治疗。寻找不良反应,并估计苯妥英浓度的峰值和谷值。使用的统计分析:均值、SD 和 P 值是通过使用 Wilcoxons 符号秩检验对血清水平的谷和峰值进行 ITT(意向治疗)分析获得的。结果:1例患者在每日一次治疗方案中出现不良反应,而tid治疗方案则无不良反应。不良反应对患者没有影响。从统计学上讲,尽管每日一次方案的峰值浓度显着更高,但方案之间的谷浓度没有显着差异。结论:总之,可以说可以为印度癫痫患者开出每日一次的方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号