首页> 外文期刊>Neurosurgery >Iatrogenic sciatic nerve injuries at buttock and thigh levels: the Louisiana State University experience review.
【24h】

Iatrogenic sciatic nerve injuries at buttock and thigh levels: the Louisiana State University experience review.

机译:臀部和大腿水平的医源性坐骨神经损伤:路易斯安那州立大学经验评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of iatrogenic sciatic nerve injuries at the buttock and thigh levels, and to analyze results of the treatment provided at Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-New Orleans. METHODS: The data from 196 patients were reviewed retrospectively. All patients had iatrogenic sciatic nerve injuries at the buttock and thigh levels and were evaluated and treated at the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center between the years 1968 and 1999. One hundred sixty-four of these patients had injuries caused by injections at the buttock level, 15 sustained sciatic nerve injuries after a total hip arthroplasty, and 17 had iatrogenic damage at the thigh level. RESULTS: Patients with severe motor deficits underwent neurolysis if they had positive nerve action potentials, and end-to-end anastomosis or grafting if the nerve action potentials were negative. Operations were performed on 64 patients with injection injuries at the buttock level, on 15 with iatrogenic damage at the thigh level, and on 15 with deficits after total hip arthroplasty. Results were analyzed by the procedure performed and by the outcome in both the peroneal and tibial divisions. CONCLUSION: Patients with mild or no motor deficits and those with pain that was manageable did not undergo surgery and were treated conservatively. For patients with significant motor deficits and those with pain that was not responsive to pharmacological management, physical and occupational therapy required surgical intervention. Patients who had positive nerve action potentials required neurolysis only and had the best recovery, whereas those with negative nerve action potentials required more extensive intervention entailing reanastomosis or grafting and had worse outcome. In general, the outcome was better for the tibial than for the peroneal divisions, regardless of the type of intervention.
机译:目的:概述臀部和大腿水平的医源性坐骨神经损伤,并分析路易斯安那州立大学健康科学中心-新奥尔良提供的治疗结果。方法:对196例患者的数据进行回顾性分析。所有患者均在臀部和大腿水平发生医源性坐骨神经损伤,并于1968年至1999年间在路易斯安那州立大学健康科学中心进行了评估和治疗。其中有164名患者因臀部注射而受伤全髋关节置换术后15例坐骨神经持续受伤,大腿水平有17例医源性损伤。结果:严重运动障碍的患者如果神经动作电位为正,则进行神经溶解;如果神经动作电位为负,则进行端到端吻合或移植。对64例在臀部注射损伤的患者,15例在大腿水平的医源性损伤以及15例全髋关节置换术后有缺陷的患者进行了手术。通过所执行的程序以及腓骨和胫骨分割的结果来分析结果。结论:轻度或无运动障碍的患者以及可控制的疼痛患者未接受手术,并接受了保守治疗。对于具有明显运动障碍的患者和对药理管理无反应的疼痛的患者,物理和职业治疗需要手术干预。具有正向神经动作电位的患者仅需神经溶解即可恢复最佳,而具有负向神经动作电位的患者则需要更广泛的干预,需要再吻合术或移植,并且预后较差。总的来说,无论采用哪种干预方式,胫骨的结果都优于腓骨的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号