...
首页> 外文期刊>Neurosurgery >Carotid artery sacrifice for unclippable and uncoilable aneurysms: endovascular occlusion vs common carotid artery ligation.
【24h】

Carotid artery sacrifice for unclippable and uncoilable aneurysms: endovascular occlusion vs common carotid artery ligation.

机译:颈动脉为不可攀爬和不可缠绕的动脉瘤而牺牲:血管内阻塞与颈总动脉结扎。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Optimal treatment of intracranial aneurysms involves complete occlusion of the aneurysm with preservation of the parent artery and all of its branches. Attempts to occlude the aneurysm and preserve the parent artery may be associated with a higher level of risk than parent vessel occlusion or trapping. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate our series of patients with large and giant aneurysms who underwent treatment via endovascular coiling with parent artery sacrifice or surgical ligation of the common carotid artery (CCA) and gain insight into the advantages and risks of each of these alternatives. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with aneurysms who underwent carotid sacrifice via endovascular occlusion or surgical CCA ligation during an 8-year period at our institution. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with large and giant aneurysms of the internal carotid artery underwent carotid artery sacrifice via endovascular occlusion (n = 15) or CCA ligation (n = 12). Of the patients who underwent endovascular occlusion, 3 developed groin complications, 1 developed a new sixth nerve palsy, 1 died from vasospasm related to subarachnoid hemorrhage, and 1 died secondary to rupture of an associated 3-mm anterior communicating artery aneurysm 5 days postoperatively. Of the patients undergoing CCA ligation, 1 patient developed a partial hypoglossal palsy. Clinical improvement of presenting symptoms was observed in all surviving patients regardless of the method of treatment. Complete aneurysm obliteration was documented in all patients during the initial hospital stay. The mean radiographic long-term follow-up was 14.2 months, which was available in 20 of the 25 surviving patients (80%). Complete obliteration was confirmed at follow-up in all but 2 patients with large cavernous aneurysms; 1 was initially treated with endovascular occlusion and the other with carotid ligation. CONCLUSION: Parent artery sacrifice is still a viable treatment for some complex aneurysms of the internal carotid artery. CCA ligation is a reasonable alternative to endovascular arterial sacrifice.
机译:背景:颅内动脉瘤的最佳治疗包括完全封闭动脉瘤,同时保留母动脉及其所有分支。尝试闭塞动脉瘤和保护亲代动脉可能比亲代血管闭塞或诱捕具有更高的风险水平。目的:评估我们的一系列大而巨大的动脉瘤患者,这些患者通过血管内盘绕术与亲代动脉牺牲或颈总动脉(CCA)手术结扎进行了血管内治疗,并深入了解了每种替代方法的优势和风险。方法:我们回顾性研究了在我们机构进行的为期8年的所有通过血管内闭塞或外科CCA结扎行颈动脉牺牲术的动脉瘤患者。结果:27例颈内动脉大而巨大的动脉瘤患者通过血管内闭塞(n = 15)或CCA结扎(n = 12)进行了颈动脉牺牲。在接受血管内闭塞的患者中,3例出现腹股沟并发症,1例出现新的第六神经麻痹,1例因蛛网膜下腔出血相关的血管痉挛死亡,1例在术后5天因相关的3 mm前交通动脉瘤破裂而死亡。在进行CCA结扎的患者中,有1名患者出现了部分舌下性麻痹。无论采用何种治疗方法,所有幸存患者均观察到临床症状改善。首次住院期间,所有患者均记录有完全的动脉瘤闭塞。 25例幸存患者中有20例(80%)可获得平均影像学长期随访,为14.2个月。除2例大海绵状动脉瘤患者外,其余所有患者均在随访中证实完全闭塞。 1例最初接受血管内阻塞治疗,另一例接受颈动脉结扎治疗。结论:对于一些复杂的颈内动脉动脉瘤,牺牲亲本动脉仍然是可行的治疗方法。 CCA结扎术是血管内动脉牺牲的合理替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号