首页> 外文期刊>Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews >Estimating functional cognition in older adults using observational assessments of task performance in complex everyday activities: A systematic review and evaluation of measurement properties
【24h】

Estimating functional cognition in older adults using observational assessments of task performance in complex everyday activities: A systematic review and evaluation of measurement properties

机译:使用观察性评估日常复杂活动中的工作表现来评估老年人的功能认知:系统地评估和评估测量属性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Functional cognition is a relatively new concept in assessment of older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Instruments need to be reliable and valid, hence we conducted a systematic review of observational assessments of task performance used to estimate functional cognition in this population. Two separate database searches were conducted: firstly to identify instruments; and secondly to identify studies reporting on the psychometric properties of the instruments. Studies were analysed using a published checklist and their quality reviewed according to specific published criteria. Clinical utility was reviewed and the information formulated into a best evidence synthesis. We found 21 instruments and included 58 studies reporting on measurement properties. The majority of studies were rated as being of fair methodological quality and the range of properties investigated was restricted. Most instruments had-studies reporting on construct validity (hypothesis testing), none on content validity and there were few studies reporting on reliability. Overall the evidence on psychometric properties is lacking and there ;is an urgent need for further evaluation of instruments. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:功能认知是评估患有轻度认知障碍或痴呆的老年人的相对较新的概念。仪器必须可靠且有效,因此我们对任务绩效的观察性评估进行了系统的评估,以评估该人群的功能认知。进行了两个单独的数据库搜索:首先是确定工具;其次,确定有关仪器心理计量特性的研究报告。使用已发布的检查表对研究进行分析,并根据特定的已发布标准审查其质量。审查了临床实用性,并将信息整理成最佳证据综合。我们找到了21项仪器,包括58项报告了测量属性的研究。多数研究被评为具有良好的方法学质量,并且所研究的属性范围受到限制。大多数仪器都有关于结构效度(假设检验)的报告,没有关于内容效度的报告,很少有报告信度的研究。总体而言,缺乏有关心理计量学特性的证据,因此迫切需要对仪器进行进一步评估。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号