首页> 外文期刊>Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews >Sleepiness as a need for sleep: when is enough, enough?
【24h】

Sleepiness as a need for sleep: when is enough, enough?

机译:嗜睡是睡眠的需要:何时足够,足够?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This review considers the relationship between sleep need and sleepiness. In healthy adults, objective measures of sleepiness (e.g. Multiple Sleep Latency Test; Psychomotor Vigilance Test) and subjective indices (e.g. Stanford Sleepiness Scale) often poorly inter-correlate and have been seen as orthogonal dimensions. This is perhaps not surprising as the methodology of these tests is quite different in, for example, their duration, testing environment, whether they are experimenter versus participant-paced, and the understanding and expectancy of participants. It is argued, here, that 'sleepiness', the 'propensity to fall asleep' and the 'need for sleep' are not synonymous, but qualitatively different. They may represent different positions on a dimension ranging from essential to non-essential sleep/sleepiness, and the position on this dimension is detected to varying extents by the different measures. As these tests can detect - and perhaps induce - levels of sleepiness which would be undetectable by, and of little concern to people under everyday situations, they can reveal a sleepiness having the potential to be misinterpreted as sleep debt.
机译:这篇评论考虑了睡眠需求和嗜睡之间的关系。在健康的成年人中,嗜睡的客观测量(例如,多次睡眠潜伏期测验;心理运动警惕性测验)与主观指数(例如,斯坦福嗜睡量表)之间的相互关系通常较差,并且被视为正交维度。这也许不足为奇,因为这些测试的方法在例如持续时间,测试环境,是实验者还是参与者节奏以及参与者的理解和期望等方面完全不同。在这里,“嗜睡”,“入睡的倾向”和“需要睡觉”不是同义词,而是本质上是不同的。它们可能在从必需睡眠到非必需睡眠/嗜睡的一个维度上表示不同的位置,并且通过不同的措施可以在不同程度上检测该维度上的位置。由于这些测试可以检测到(也许诱发)睡眠水平,而这种水平是人们在日常情况下无法检测到的,几乎不需要关心,因此它们可以揭示出可能被误解为睡眠债务的睡眠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号