首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychologia >More attention when speaking: Does it help or does it hurt?
【24h】

More attention when speaking: Does it help or does it hurt?

机译:讲话时要多加注意:它有帮助还是有伤害?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Paying selective attention to a word in a multi-word utterance results in a decreased probability of error on that word (benefit), but an increased probability of error on the other words (cost). We ask whether excitation of the prefrontal cortex helps or hurts this cost. One hypothesis (the resource hypothesis) predicts a decrease in the cost due to the deployment of more attentional resources, while another (the focus hypothesis) predicts even greater costs due to further fine-tuning of selective attention. Our results are more consistent with the focus hypothesis: prefrontal stimulation caused a reliable increase in the benefit and a marginal increase in the cost of selective attention. To ensure that the effects are due to changes to the prefrontal cortex, we provide two checks: We show that the pattern of results is quite different if, instead, the primary motor cortex is stimulated. We also show that the stimulation-related benefits in the verbal task correlate with the stimulation-related benefits in an N-back task, which is known to tap into a prefrontal function. Our results shed light on how selective attention affects language production, and more generally, on how selective attention affects production of a sequence over time.
机译:选择性注意多词话语中的一个词会导致该词的错误概率降低(收益),而另一个词的错误概率增加(成本)。我们询问对前额叶皮层的刺激是否有助于或损害这一成本。一种假设(资源假设)预测由于部署更多关注资源而导致的成本降低,而另一种假设(焦点假设)预测因选择性关注的进一步微调而产生的成本更高。我们的结果与焦点假设更为吻合:前额叶刺激引起收益的可靠增加,而选择性注意的成本略有增加。为了确保效果是由于前额叶皮层的变化而引起的,我们提供了两项检查:我们显示,如果改为刺激初级运动皮层,则结果的模式将完全不同。我们还表明,口头任务中与刺激相关的好处与N背任务中与刺激相关的好处相关,已知该任务可以利用前额叶功能。我们的结果揭示了选择性注意如何影响语言产生,更广泛地讲,选择性注意如何随着时间影响序列的产生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号