首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychologia >'Pre-semantic' cognition revisited: critical differences between semantic aphasia and semantic dementia.
【24h】

'Pre-semantic' cognition revisited: critical differences between semantic aphasia and semantic dementia.

机译:重新“前语义”认知:语义失语和语义痴呆之间的关键差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Patients with semantic dementia show a specific pattern of impairment on both verbal and non-verbal "pre-semantic" tasks, e.g., reading aloud, past tense generation, spelling to dictation, lexical decision, object decision, colour decision and delayed picture copying. All seven tasks are characterised by poorer performance for items that are atypical of the domain and "regularization errors" (irregular/atypical items are produced as if they were domain-typical). The emergence of this pattern across diverse tasks in the same patients indicates that semantic memory plays a key role in all of these types of "pre-semantic" processing. However, this claim remains controversial because semantically impaired patients sometimes fail to show an influence of regularity. This study demonstrates that (a) the location of brain damage and (b) the underlying nature of the semantic deficit affect the likelihood of observing the expected relationship between poor comprehension and regularity effects. We compared the effect of multimodal semantic impairment in the context of semantic dementia and stroke aphasia on the seven "pre-semantic" tasks listed above. In all of these tasks, the semantic aphasia patients were less sensitive to typicality than the semantic dementia patients, even though the two groups obtained comparable scores on semantic tests. The semantic aphasia group also made fewer regularization errors and many more unrelated and perseverative responses. We propose that these group differences reflect the different locus for the semantic impairment in the two conditions: patients with semantic dementia have degraded semantic representations, whereas semantic aphasia patients show deregulated semantic cognition with concomitant executive deficits. These findings suggest a reinterpretation of single-case studies of comprehension-impaired aphasic patients who fail to show the expected effect of regularity on "pre-semantic" tasks. Consequently, such cases do not demonstrate the independence of these tasks from semantic memory.
机译:患有语义性痴呆的患者在言语和非言语“语义前”任务上均显示出特定的损伤模式,例如大声朗读,过去时态生成,听写拼写,词汇决定,宾语决定,色彩决定和图片复制延迟。所有这七个任务的特征在于,非典型项目的性能较差,并且出现“正则化错误”(产生不规则/非典型项目,就好像它们是典型域的一样)。在同一患者中,跨各种任务的这种模式的出现表明,语义记忆在所有这些类型的“语义前”处理中都起着关键作用。但是,由于语义受损的患者有时无法表现出规律性的影响,因此这一主张仍然存在争议。这项研究表明,(a)脑损伤的位置和(b)语义缺陷的内在性质会影响观察不良理解力和规律性效应之间预期关系的可能性。我们比较了在语义痴呆和中风失语的背景下多模式语义障碍对上述七个“语义前”任务的影响。在所有这些任务中,语义失语症患者对典型性的敏感性不如语义痴呆症患者,即使两组在语义测试中获得了相当的分数。语义失语症小组的正则化错误也更少,而更多的无关和持久的回应。我们认为,这些群体差异反映了两种情况下语义障碍的不同位置:语义痴呆患者的语义表征下降,而语义失语患者表现出放松的语义认知并伴有执行缺陷。这些发现表明,对未能表现出规律性对“语义前”任务的预期影响的理解障碍性失语症患者的单例研究进行了重新解释。因此,这种情况不能证明这些任务与语义记忆的独立性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号