首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychologia >Semantic control and modality: An input processing deficit in aphasia leading to deregulated semantic cognition in a single modality
【24h】

Semantic control and modality: An input processing deficit in aphasia leading to deregulated semantic cognition in a single modality

机译:语义控制和情态:失语症的输入处理缺陷导致单一情态的语义认知失调

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Research suggests that semantic memory deficits can occur in at least three ways. Patients can (1) show amodal degradation of concepts within the semantic store itself, such as in semantic dementia (SD), (2) have difficulty in controlling activation within the semantic system and accessing appropriate knowledge in line with current goals or context, as in semantic aphasia (SA) and (3) experience a semantic deficit in only one modality following degraded input from sensory cortex. Patients with SA show deficits of semantic control and access across word and picture tasks, consistent with the view that their problems arise from impaired modality-general control processes. However, there are a few reports in the literature of patients with semantic access problems restricted to auditory-verbal materials, who show decreasing ability to retrieve concepts from words when they are presented repeatedly with closely related distractors. These patients challenge the notion that semantic control processes are modality-general and suggest instead a separation of 'access' to auditory-verbal and non-verbal semantic systems. We had the rare opportunity to study such a case in detail. Our aims were to examine the effect of manipulations of control demands in auditory-verbal semantic, non-verbal semantic and non-semantic tasks, allowing us to assess whether such cases always show semantic control/access impairments that follow a modality-specific pattern, or whether there are alternative explanations. Our findings revealed: (1) deficits on executive tasks, unrelated to semantic demands, which were more evident in the auditory modality than the visual modality; (2) deficits in executively-demanding semantic tasks which were accentuated in the auditory-verbal domain compared with the visual modality, but still present on non-verbal tasks, and (3) a coupling between comprehension and executive control requirements, in that mild impairment on single word comprehension was greatly increased on more demanding, associative judgements across modalities. This pattern of results suggests that mild executive-semantic impairment, paired with disrupted connectivity from auditory input, may give rise to semantic 'access' deficits affecting only the auditory modality.
机译:研究表明,语义记忆缺陷可能至少以三种方式发生。患者可以(1)在语义存储库本身中显示概念的模态退化,例如在语义痴呆症(SD)中;(2)难以控制语义系统中的激活以及根据当前目标或上下文访问适当的知识,因为语义失语症(SA)和(3)中的“失语”仅在感觉皮层输入降低后的一种模态中出现语义缺陷。 SA患者在单词和图片任务上表现出语义控制和访问上的缺陷,这与他们的问题来自模态-一般控制过程受损的观点一致。然而,在文献中有一些报告涉及语义访问问题仅限于听觉-语言材料的患者,当反复出现与密切相关的干扰词时,他们从单词检索概念的能力下降。这些患者质疑语义控制过程是模态通用的概念,而是建议将“访问”分离到听觉-语言和非语言语义系统。我们难得有机会详细研究这种情况。我们的目的是检查控制需求的操作在听觉-语言语义,非语言语义和非语义任务中的作用,从而使我们能够评估此类情况是否始终显示遵循特定于情态的模式的语义控制/访问障碍,或是否有其他解释。我们的发现表明:(1)与语义需求无关的执行任务缺陷,在听觉方式上比视觉方式上更明显; (2)与视觉模态相比,在听觉-言语领域中执行要求高的语义任务出现缺陷,但仍然存在于非言语任务中;(3)在这种温和的情况下,理解与执行控制要求之间存在关联跨模态的更苛刻的关联判断极大地增加了单字理解的障碍。这种结果模式表明,轻度的执行者语义障碍,以及来自听觉输入的连接性中断,可能导致仅影响听觉方式的语义“访问”缺陷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号