首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychobiology >EEG vigilance regulation patterns and their discriminative power to separate patients with major depression from healthy controls.
【24h】

EEG vigilance regulation patterns and their discriminative power to separate patients with major depression from healthy controls.

机译:脑电图警惕性调节模式及其区分能力,可将重度抑郁症患者与健康对照区分开。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background/Aim: Recently, a framework has been presented that links vigilance regulation, i.e. tonic brain arousal, with clinical symptoms of affective disorders. Against this background, the aim of this study was to deepen the knowledge of vigilance regulation by (1) identifying different patterns of vigilance regulation at rest in healthy subjects (n = 141) and (2) comparing the frequency distribution of these patterns between unmedicated patients with major depression (MD; n = 30) and healthy controls (HCs; n = 30). Method: Each 1-second segment of 15-min resting EEGs from 141 healthy subjects was classified as 1 of 7 different vigilance stages using the Vigilance Algorithm Leipzig. K-means clustering was used to distinguish different patterns of EEG vigilance regulation. The frequency distribution of these patterns was analyzed in independent data of 30 unmedicated MD patients and 30 matched HCs using a χ(2) test. Results: The 3-cluster solution with a stable, a slowly declining and an unstable vigilance regulation pattern yielded the highest mathematical quality and performed best for separation of MD patients and HCs (χ(2) = 13.34; p < 0.001). Patterns with stable vigilance regulation were found significantly more often in patients with MD than in HCs. Conclusion: A stable vigilance regulation pattern, derived from a large sample of HCs, characterizes most patients with MD and separates them from matched HCs with a sensitivity between 67 and 73% and a specificity between 67 and 80%. The pattern of vigilance regulation might be a useful biomarker for delineating MD subgroups, e.g. for treatment prediction.
机译:背景/目的:最近,已经提出了一种框架,该框架将警惕性调节即滋补性脑唤醒与情感障碍的临床症状联系起来。在这种背景下,本研究的目的是通过(1)在健康受试者中确定静息警戒调节的不同模式(n = 141),以及(2)比较这些模式在非药物治疗之间的频率分布,来加深警惕调节的知识。患有严重抑郁症(MD; n = 30)和健康对照(HCs; n = 30)的患者。方法:使用Viipance Algorithm Leipzig将来自141名健康受试者的15分钟静息EEG的每个1秒片段分类为7个不同警戒阶段之一。 K-均值聚类用于区分脑电图警戒性调节的不同模式。使用χ(2)检验,在30名未接受药物治疗的MD患者和30名匹配的HCs的独立数据中分析了这些模式的频率分布。结果:具有稳定,缓慢下降和不稳定的警戒调节模式的3簇溶液产生了最高的数学质量,并且在MD患者和HCs的分离中表现最佳(χ(2)= 13.34; p <0.001)。在MD患者中,相比于HC,发现具有稳定警惕性调节的模式的发生率明显更高。结论:源自大量HC的稳定的警戒调节模式可表征大多数MD患者,并将其与匹配的HC分离,敏感性在67%至73%之间,特异性在67%至80%之间。警惕性调节模式可能是描绘MD亚组的有用生物标记。用于治疗预测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号