首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychologia >Exploring multimodal semantic control impairments in semantic aphasia: evidence from naturalistic object use.
【24h】

Exploring multimodal semantic control impairments in semantic aphasia: evidence from naturalistic object use.

机译:探索语义失语症的多模态语义控制障碍:来自自然对象使用的证据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Semantic processing can break down in qualitatively distinct ways in different neuropsychological populations. Previous studies have shown that patients with multimodal semantic impairments following stroke - referred to as semantic aphasia (SA) - show deficits on a range of conceptual tasks due to a failure of semantic control processes in the context of prefrontal and/or temporoparietal infarction. Although a deficit of semantic control would be expected to impair performance in all modalities in parallel, most previous research in this patient group has focussed primarily on tasks employing words. This study explored the consequences of deregulated semantic cognition for an indisputably non-verbal task-naturalistic object use. Patients with SA performed more poorly than control participants on a range of everyday tasks assessed by the Naturalistic Action Test (NAT, Schwartz, M. F., Buxbaum, L. J., Ferraro, M., Veramonti, T., & Segal, M. (2002). Naturalistic action test. Thames Valley Test Company). Moreover, their scores on this assessment correlated with those obtained on language-based semantic tasks, suggesting that a common deficit could underlie the impairment in both modalities. As previously observed in the verbal domain, performance on the NAT was poorer when control processes were taxed by dual-task situations and the inclusion of semantically related distracting objects. A number of characteristics of the patients' action sequences were specifically indicative of deregulated semantic cognition. Their everyday action sequences were highly fragmented by a tendency to abandon subtasks before their completion and engage, instead, in extended periods of aimless "toying" with objects. The patient group also exhibited recurrent perseverative behaviour. These findings parallel the performance of a recurrent connectionist model of naturalistic action developed by Botvinick and Plaut [Botvinick, M. & Plaut, D. C. (2004). Doing without schema hierarchies: A recurrent connectionist approach to normal and impaired routine sequential action. Psychological Review, 111, 395-429], after the mechanism responsible for controlling action in a temporally sensitive manner was damaged. This study provides converging evidence for a failure of control processes underlying semantic memory impairment in SA, which is reflected not only in patients' performance on language-based tasks, but also in the non-verbal domain of naturalistic object use.
机译:在不同的神经心理学人群中,语义处理可以以质的方式分解。先前的研究表明,中风后患有多模态语义障碍的患者-称为语义性失语症(SA)-由于前额叶和/或颞顶动脉梗塞的情况下语义控制程序的失败,显示出一系列概念任务的缺陷。尽管预计语义控制的不足会同时影响所有模式的性能,但该患者组中的大多数以前的研究主要集中在使用单词的任务上。这项研究探讨了毫无意义的非语言任务自然主义对象使用的语义认知失调的后果。 SA患者在通过自然动作测试评估的一系列日常任务中的表现比对照组参与者差(NAT,Schwartz,MF,Buxbaum,LJ,Ferraro,M.,Veramonti,T。和Segal,M。(2002)自然动作测试(泰晤士河谷测试公司)。此外,他们在该评估中的分数与在基于语言的语义任务中获得的分数相关,这表明在这两种方式的损害中,常见缺陷可能是基础。如先前在口头领域中所观察到的,当控制任务受双重任务情况和包含语义相关的干扰对象的影响时,NAT的性能较差。患者动作序列的许多特征明确表明了语义认知的失调。他们的日常动作序列由于在完成任务之前放弃子任务并倾向于长时间地无目标地“玩弄”物体而趋于零散。患者组还表现出反复的持久性行为。这些发现与Botvinick和Plaut [Botvinick,M.&Plaut,D. C.(2004)开发的自然主义行动的经常联系主义模型的表现相似。不使用模式层次结构进行操作:一种针对常规和有缺陷的例行顺序​​操作的循环连接方法。 Psychological Review,111,395-429],以时间敏感方式控制动作的机制被破坏之后。这项研究为SA语义记忆障碍背后的控制过程失败提供了越来越多的证据,这不仅体现在患者在基于语言的任务上的表现,而且还体现在自然对象使用的非言语领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号