首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychologia >Attentional orienting induced by arrows and eye-gaze compared with an endogenous cue.
【24h】

Attentional orienting induced by arrows and eye-gaze compared with an endogenous cue.

机译:与内源性提示相比,箭头和视线引起的注意定向。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Exogenous orienting has been widely studied by using peripheral cues whereas endogenous orienting has been studied with directional central cues. However, recent evidence has shown that centrally presented eye-gaze and arrows may produce an automatic rather than voluntary orienting of attention. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the behavioural and electrophysiological (event-related potentials-ERP) correlates of the attentional shift induced by arrows and eye-gaze. In order to have a control condition, we compared arrows and eye-gaze with a purely endogenous cue, i.e., a texture arbitrarily coding one direction. We analyzed the ERP components (P1, N1, P2a, P2p, P3) elicited by the cue stimuli and the early lateralised attentional effect (early directing attention negativity-EDAN). In addition, in order to investigate the topography of the neural mechanisms underlying the cortical activity in each cueing condition, we applied a temporal segmentation procedure. The results showed that the three cueing conditions induced a different strength of activation within the same cortical network. Occipito-parietal regions were involved in the early processing of visual information, followed by an involvement of frontal areas, likely implicated in learning associations. These data confirm the assumption that, in contrast to purely endogenous cues, arrows and eye-gaze induce a very fast attentional shift. However, the similarity of the ERP components and of the topographical cortical maps among conditions suggest that this early orienting of attention is more likely related to an overlearned association mechanism rather than to a real exogenous attentional process.
机译:外源性定向已通过使用外围提示进行了广泛研究,而内源性定向已通过定向中心提示进行了研究。但是,最近的证据表明,集中显示的目光和箭头可能会自动产生注意力,而不是自愿地引起注意力。因此,本研究的目的是研究由箭头和视线引起的注意力转移的行为和电生理(事件相关电位-ERP)的相关性。为了获得控制条件,我们将箭头和眼睛注视与纯内源性提示(即任意编码一个方向的纹理)进行了比较。我们分析了提示刺激和早期侧向注意效应(早期指导注意负性-EDAN)引起的ERP组件(P1,N1,P2a,P2p,P3)。此外,为了研究每种提示条件下皮质活动的神经机制的拓扑结构,我们应用了时间分割程序。结果表明,这三种提示条件在同一皮层网络中诱导了不同的激活强度。枕骨顶区参与视觉信息的早期处理,然后涉及额叶区域,这可能与学习联想有关。这些数据证实了这样一个假设,即与纯内源性提示相反,箭头和视线会引起非常快速的注意力转移。但是,ERP组件和地形皮层图在条件之间的相似性表明,注意力的这种早期定向更可能与过度学习的关联机制有关,而不是与真正的外在注意过程有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号