首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychologia >Better or worse than expected? Aging, learning, and the ERN.
【24h】

Better or worse than expected? Aging, learning, and the ERN.

机译:比预期的好还是坏?老龄化,学习和ERN。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study examined age differences in error processing and reinforcement learning. We were interested in whether the electrophysiological correlates of error processing, the error-related negativity (ERN) and the feedback-related negativity (FRN), reflect learning-related changes in younger and older adults. To do so, we applied a probabilistic learning task in which we manipulated the validity of feedback. The results of our study showed that learning-related changes were much more pronounced (a) in a response-locked positivity for correct trials compared to the ERN and (b) in a feedback-locked positivity for positive feedback compared to the FRN. These findings provide an important extension to recent theoretical accounts [Holroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. H. (2002). The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 109, 679-709; Nieuwenhuis, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Talsma, D., Coles, M. G. H., Holroyd, C. B., Kok, A.,et al. (2002). A computational account of altered error processing in older age: Dopamine and the error-related negativity. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 19-36] since they suggest that positive learning signals on correct trials contribute to the reward-related variance in the response- and feedback-locked ERPs. This effect has been overlooked in previous studies that have focused on the role of errors and negative feedback for learning. Importantly, we did not find evidence for an age-related reduction of the ERN, when controlling for performance differences between age groups, which questions the view that older adults are generally impaired in error processing. Finally, we observed a substantial reduction of the FRN in the elderly, which indicates that older adults are less affected by negative feedback and rely more on positive feedback during learning. This finding points to an age-related asymmetry in the processing of feedback valence.
机译:这项研究检查了错误处理和强化学习中的年龄差异。我们对错误处理,错误相关的阴性(ERN)和反馈相关的阴性(FRN)的电生理学相关性是否反映了年轻人和老年人的学习相关变化感兴趣。为此,我们应用了概率学习任务,其中我们操纵了反馈的有效性。我们的研究结果表明,与学习相关的变化(a)与ERN相比,对正确试验的反应锁定阳性更为明显;(b)与FRN相比,对阳性反馈的反馈锁定阳性更为明显。这些发现为最近的理论解释提供了重要的扩展[Holroyd,C。B。,&Coles,M。G. H.(2002)。人为错误处理的神经基础:强化学习,多巴胺和与错误相关的否定性。心理评论,109,679-709; Nieuwenhuis,S.,Ridderinkhof,K.R.,Talsma,D.,Coles,M.G.H.,Holroyd,C.B.,Kok,A.,等。 (2002)。较老的错误处理过程发生变化的计算说明:多巴胺和与错误相关的否定性。认知,情感和行为神经科学,第2期,第19-36页],因为他们认为正确试验中的积极学习信号有助于响应和反馈锁定的ERP中与奖励相关的差异。以前的研究集中在错误和负面反馈在学习中的作用上,这种效应已被忽略。重要的是,当控制年龄组之间的性能差异时,我们没有找到与年龄相关的ERN降低的证据,这质疑了老年人通常在错误处理方面受到损害的观点。最后,我们观察到老年人的FRN显着降低,这表明老年人在学习过程中受到负面反馈的影响较小,而更多地依赖于正面反馈。这一发现指出了在处理反馈价时与年龄有关的不对称性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号