首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychologia >You can play 20 questions with nature and win: Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations as a case study.
【24h】

You can play 20 questions with nature and win: Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations as a case study.

机译:您可以自然而然地打出20个问题并获胜:作为案例研究的分类空间关系与协调空间关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Alan Newell famously asserted that "You can't play 20 questions with nature and win" (Newell, A. (1973). You can't play 20 questions with nature and win. In W.G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing. New York: Academic Press.), and specifically focused on the futility of studying binary distinctions. However, the distinction between categorical and coordinate spatial relations representations has turned out to be fruitful. In this brief article, the categorical/coordinate distinction is treated as a case study, as a way to address a more general point, namely how to play 20 questions with nature and win. The key to studying binary distinctions may lie in the ways this one differs from previous ones. First, from the outset this distinction was cast within the context of a theory of a more general processing system; second, it was formulated from the perspective of multiple levels of analysis within a processing system, and thereby bridges characteristics of information processing with characteristics of the brain.
机译:艾伦·纽厄尔(Alan Newell)著名地断言“您不能与自然界共赢20个问题”(Newell,A.(1973)。您不能与自然界共赢20个问题。在WG Chase(编辑),视觉信息处理纽约:学术出版社),并专门研究二进制区别是徒劳的。但是,分类空间坐标表示和坐标空间关系表示之间的区别已证明是富有成果的。在这篇简短的文章中,分类/坐标区别被视为案例研究,作为一种解决更普遍点的方法,即如何与自然界中的20个问题打赢。研究二进制区别的关键可能在于这一区别与以前的区别。首先,从一开始,这种区别是在更通用的处理系统理论的背景下进行的。其次,它是根据处理系统中多个分析级别的观点制定的,从而将信息处理的特征与大脑的特征联系起来。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号