首页> 外文期刊>NeuroImage >Neuromagnetic localization of rhythmic activity in the human brain: a comparison of three methods.
【24h】

Neuromagnetic localization of rhythmic activity in the human brain: a comparison of three methods.

机译:人脑节律活动的神经磁定位:三种方法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Cortical rhythmic activity is increasingly employed for characterizing human brain function. Using MEG, it is possible to localize the generators of these rhythms. Traditionally, the source locations have been estimated using sequential dipole modeling. Recently, two new methods for localizing rhythmic activity have been developed, Dynamic Imaging of Coherent Sources (DICS) and Frequency-Domain Minimum Current Estimation (MCE(FD)). With new analysis methods emerging, the researcher faces the problem of choosing an appropriate strategy. The aim of this study was to compare the performance and reliability of these three methods. The evaluation was performed using measured data from four healthy subjects, as well as with simulations of rhythmic activity. We found that the methods gave comparable results, and that all three approaches localized the principal sources of oscillatory activity very well. Dipole modeling is a very powerful tool once appropriate subsets of sensors have been selected. MCE(FD) provides simultaneous localization of sources and was found to give a good overview of the data. With DICS, it was possible to separate close-by sources that were not retrieved by the other two methods.
机译:皮质节律活动越来越多地用于表征人脑功能。使用MEG,可以定位这些节奏的生成器。传统上,源位置是使用顺序偶极子建模估算的。最近,已经开发了两种用于定位节奏活动的新方法:相干源动态成像(DICS)和频域最小电流估计(MCE(FD))。随着新的分析方法的出现,研究人员面临选择适当策略的问题。本研究的目的是比较这三种方法的性能和可靠性。使用来自四个健康受试者的测量数据以及节律活动的模拟进行评估。我们发现这些方法给出了可比的结果,并且所有三种方法都很好地定位了振荡活动的主要来源。一旦选择了合适的传感器子集,偶极子建模将是一个非常强大的工具。 MCE(FD)提供了源的同时本地化,并且发现它可以很好地概述数据。使用DICS,可以分离其他两种方法未检索到的邻近源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号