...
首页> 外文期刊>NeuroImage >Combining MRI and CSF measures for classification of Alzheimer's disease and prediction of mild cognitive impairment conversion
【24h】

Combining MRI and CSF measures for classification of Alzheimer's disease and prediction of mild cognitive impairment conversion

机译:结合MRI和CSF措施对阿尔茨海默氏病进行分类并预测轻度认知障碍转化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The suggested revision of the NINCDS-ADRDA criterion for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) includes at least one abnormal biomarker among magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). We aimed to investigate if the combination of baseline MRI and CSF could enhance the classification of AD compared to using either alone and predict mild cognitive impairment (MCI) conversion at multiple future time points. 369 subjects from the Alzheimer's disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) were included in the study (AD=96, MCI=162 and CTL=111). Freesurfer was used to generate regional subcortical volumes and cortical thickness measures. A total of 60 variables were used for orthogonal partial least squares to latent structures (OPLS) multivariate analysis (57 MRI measures and 3 CSF measures: Aβ 42, t-tau and p-tau). Combining MRI and CSF gave the best results for distinguishing AD vs. CTL. We found an accuracy of 91.8% for the combined model at baseline compared to 81.6% for CSF measures and 87.0% for MRI measures alone. The combined model also gave the best accuracy when distinguishing between MCI vs. CTL (77.6%) at baseline. MCI subjects who converted to AD by 12 and 18month follow-up were accurately predicted at baseline using an AD vs. CTL model (82.9% and 86.4% respectively), with lower prediction accuracies for those MCI subjects converting by 24 and 36month follow up (75.4% and 68.0% respectively). The overall prediction accuracies for converters and non-converters ranged from 58.6% to 66.4% at different time points. Combining MRI and CSF measures in a multivariate model at baseline gave better accuracy for discriminating between AD and CTL, between MCI and CTL and for predicting future conversion from MCI to AD, than using either MRI or CSF separately.
机译:建议对NINCDS-ADRDA标准进行修订,以诊断阿尔茨海默氏病(AD),其中包括磁共振成像(MRI),正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和脑脊液(CSF)中的至少一种异常生物标记。我们旨在研究基线MRI和CSF的组合是否比单独使用可增强AD的分类,并预测未来多个时间点的轻度认知障碍(MCI)转换。来自阿尔茨海默氏病神经影像学倡议(ADNI)的369名受试者被纳入研究(AD = 96,MCI = 162和CTL = 111)。 Freesurfer用于生成区域皮层下体积和皮层厚度测量值。共有60个变量用于与潜在结构正交的局部偏最小二乘(OPLS)多元分析(57个MRI量度和3个CSF量度:Aβ42,t-tau和p-tau)。 MRI和CSF的结合可以最好地区分AD与CTL。我们发现组合模型在基线时的准确度为91.8%,而仅脑脊液测量为81.6%,而MRI测量为87.0%。当在基线时区分MCI与CTL(77.6%)时,组合模型还提供了最佳准确性。使用AD vs. CTL模型在基线时准确预测了在12和18个月随访中转化为AD的MCI受试者(分别为82.9%和86.4%),而那些在24和36个月随访中转化为MCI受试者的预测准确性较低(分别为75.4%和68.0%)。转换器和非转换器的总预测准确度在不同时间点范围从58.6%到66.4%。与分别使用MRI或CSF相比,在基线的多变量模型中将MRI和CSF措施相结合可以更好地区分AD和CTL,MCI和CTL以及预测从MCI到AD的转换。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号